answersLogoWhite

0

Yes, many African Americans were forced into sharecropping and tenant farming after the abolition of slavery due to limited economic opportunities and systemic racism. They faced discrimination in accessing education, land ownership, and fair wages, which pushed many into these forms of agricultural labor as a means of survival.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Sociology

What was the difference between tenant farmers and sharecroppers?

Tenant farmers rented land and paid a fixed rent to the landowner, while sharecroppers did not pay rent but instead received a portion of the crops they grew as payment. Sharecroppers typically had less control over their farming decisions and were more vulnerable to exploitation than tenant farmers.


Tenant farmers were more likely than sharecroppers to what?

own plows


What was the difference between a sharecropper and a tenant farmer.?

Sharecroppers typically received a portion of the crops they grew as payment for their labor and use of land, while tenant farmers paid rent for the land they used and kept all the profits from the crops they produced. Sharecroppers had less control and autonomy over their work compared to tenant farmers.


Why Tenant farmers were more likely than sharecroppers to?

Tenant farmers were more likely than sharecroppers to have more control over their land and crops, as they paid cash rent and had more freedom to choose what to plant. Tenant farmers were also more independent in managing their own expenses and reaping the profits from their harvests. Sharecroppers, on the other hand, typically had less control over their farming operations and often operated under more restrictive agreements with landowners.


Who were the share croppers?

Sharecroppers were farmers, often African Americans in the Southern United States after the Civil War, who worked on land owned by others in exchange for a share of the crops they produced. They were often in a cycle of poverty and debt due to unfair contracts and exploitative practices by landowners.

Related Questions

How were tenant farmers different from sharecroppers?

Tenant farmers were different from sharecroppers because they usually had their own tools and animals.


Which form of the following did most sharecroppers and tenant farmers make their living?

Sharecroppers and tenant farmers made their living from cash crops.


What did most sharecroppers and tenant farmers make their living?

Corn


What was the difference between tenant farmers and sharecroppers?

Tenant farmers rented land and paid a fixed rent to the landowner, while sharecroppers did not pay rent but instead received a portion of the crops they grew as payment. Sharecroppers typically had less control over their farming decisions and were more vulnerable to exploitation than tenant farmers.


How did tenant farmers differ from sharecroppers?

Used their own tools and animals


Who made a living off of cash crops?

Sharecroppers and Tenant Farmers


Are Tenant farmers in Uruguay known as gauchos?

Tenant farmers in Uruguay are known as gauchos. Such farmers will lease land for cultivation and are different from sharecroppers.


What type of crops did most sharecroppers and tenant farmers grow?

cash crops


What type of crups did most sharecroppers and tenant farmers grow?

cash crops


Tenant farmers were more likely than sharecroppers to what?

own plows


From which of the following did most sharecropper and tenant farmer make their living?

Sharecroppers and tenant farmers made their living from cash crops.


What has the author Howard Kester written?

Howard Kester has written: 'Revolt among the sharecroppers' -- subject(s): Cotton growing, History, Sharecroppers, Sharecropping, Southern Tenant Farmers' Union, Tenant farmers, United States, United States. Agricultural Adjustment Administration