According to Melvin Tumin, the result of social stratification is the exclusion of certain groups from accessing resources and opportunities, leading to unequal distribution of wealth, power, and status in society. This can perpetuate inequalities and limit social mobility for those at the lower levels of the social hierarchy.
That the result of social stratification is conflict, not function. APEX
The division of large numbers of people into layers based on their relative power is known as stratification. This process can result in social hierarchies where individuals or groups are ranked according to various criteria such as wealth, status, or access to resources. Stratification can lead to inequality and differences in opportunities among different layers of society.
Some approaches in the study of social stratification include structural functionalism, which focuses on how social institutions contribute to social inequality; conflict theory, which views social stratification as a result of competition for resources; and symbolic interactionism, which emphasizes how individuals' interactions and roles contribute to social hierarchy. These approaches offer different perspectives on how social hierarchies are created and maintained.
According to Davis-Moore, social stratification results from a functional necessity in society, where certain positions are more important and require higher levels of skill and training. As a result, there is a natural hierarchy that rewards individuals who occupy these positions with higher levels of power, prestige, and income. This system is believed to motivate individuals to work hard and strive for success in order to attain higher social positions.
The main theoretical perspectives of social stratification are structural-functionalism, which sees stratification as necessary for society to function efficiently; conflict theory, which views stratification as a result of competition for scarce resources; and symbolic interactionism, which emphasizes how individual interactions contribute to the maintenance of stratification. Other perspectives include feminist theory, which examines how gender intersects with stratification, and intersectionality, which considers how multiple social identities interact to shape an individual's position in society.
That the result of social stratification is conflict, not function. APEX
Social stratification in the Caribbean is influenced by historical factors such as colonialism and slavery, which created hierarchical structures based on race and class. Economic disparities, limited access to education and healthcare, and political factors also contribute to social stratification in the region. Additionally, cultural norms and traditions can reinforce social divisions and inequalities.
Social stratification is can be refer to as division of a society into layers according τ☺ their property, prestige and power. And also involved ranking of group of people.
The key determinants of social stratification are economic, social and political policies.
Some approaches in the study of social stratification include structural functionalism, which focuses on how social institutions contribute to social inequality; conflict theory, which views social stratification as a result of competition for resources; and symbolic interactionism, which emphasizes how individuals' interactions and roles contribute to social hierarchy. These approaches offer different perspectives on how social hierarchies are created and maintained.
The main theoretical perspectives of social stratification are structural-functionalism, which sees stratification as necessary for society to function efficiently; conflict theory, which views stratification as a result of competition for scarce resources; and symbolic interactionism, which emphasizes how individual interactions contribute to the maintenance of stratification. Other perspectives include feminist theory, which examines how gender intersects with stratification, and intersectionality, which considers how multiple social identities interact to shape an individual's position in society.
The division of large numbers of people into layers based on their relative power is known as stratification. This process can result in social hierarchies where individuals or groups are ranked according to various criteria such as wealth, status, or access to resources. Stratification can lead to inequality and differences in opportunities among different layers of society.
The five basic characteristics of social stratification are: a) Ancient Stratification / The Antiquity of Social stratification b) The Ubiquity of Stratification c) The Social Patterning of Stratification d) The Diversity of Form and Amount of Stratification e) The Consequences of Stratification
Social Inequality: Condition whereby people have unequal access to valued resources, services, and positions in society.Social Stratification: Inequality has been institutionalized, and there is a system of social relationships that determines who gets what, and why.
Social inequality reflects the social-conflict theorists ideas about social stratification.
Both appeared as a result of the Neolithic Revolution.
Social stratification refers to the hierarchical arrangement of individuals into different social classes based on factors like wealth, power, and prestige. It determines the access people have to resources, opportunities, and social mobility, creating inequalities and divisions within society.