0
According to Melvin Tumin, the result of social stratification is the exclusion of certain groups from accessing resources and opportunities, leading to unequal distribution of wealth, power, and status in society. This can perpetuate inequalities and limit social mobility for those at the lower levels of the social hierarchy.
What else can I help you with?
What was Melvin tumin's critique of the theories of kingley Davis and wilbert Moore?
That the result of social stratification is conflict, not function. APEX
What is the division of large numbers of people into layers according to their relative power?
The division of large numbers of people into layers based on their relative power is known as stratification. This process can result in social hierarchies where individuals or groups are ranked according to various criteria such as wealth, status, or access to resources. Stratification can lead to inequality and differences in opportunities among different layers of society.
What are the Approaches in the study of Social Stratification?
Some approaches in the study of social stratification include structural functionalism, which focuses on how social institutions contribute to social inequality; conflict theory, which views social stratification as a result of competition for resources; and symbolic interactionism, which emphasizes how individuals' interactions and roles contribute to social hierarchy. These approaches offer different perspectives on how social hierarchies are created and maintained.
What is the the result of social stratification according to Davis-Moore?
According to Davis-Moore, social stratification results from a functional necessity in society, where certain positions are more important and require higher levels of skill and training. As a result, there is a natural hierarchy that rewards individuals who occupy these positions with higher levels of power, prestige, and income. This system is believed to motivate individuals to work hard and strive for success in order to attain higher social positions.
What are the theoretical perspectives of social stratification?
The main theoretical perspectives of social stratification are structural-functionalism, which sees stratification as necessary for society to function efficiently; conflict theory, which views stratification as a result of competition for scarce resources; and symbolic interactionism, which emphasizes how individual interactions contribute to the maintenance of stratification. Other perspectives include feminist theory, which examines how gender intersects with stratification, and intersectionality, which considers how multiple social identities interact to shape an individual's position in society.
What was Melvin tumin's critique of the theories of kingley Davis and wilbert Moore?
That the result of social stratification is conflict, not function. APEX
What is the division of large numbers of people into layers according to their relative power?
The division of large numbers of people into layers based on their relative power is known as stratification. This process can result in social hierarchies where individuals or groups are ranked according to various criteria such as wealth, status, or access to resources. Stratification can lead to inequality and differences in opportunities among different layers of society.
What are the Approaches in the study of Social Stratification?
Some approaches in the study of social stratification include structural functionalism, which focuses on how social institutions contribute to social inequality; conflict theory, which views social stratification as a result of competition for resources; and symbolic interactionism, which emphasizes how individuals' interactions and roles contribute to social hierarchy. These approaches offer different perspectives on how social hierarchies are created and maintained.
What is the the result of social stratification according to Davis-Moore?
According to Davis-Moore, social stratification results from a functional necessity in society, where certain positions are more important and require higher levels of skill and training. As a result, there is a natural hierarchy that rewards individuals who occupy these positions with higher levels of power, prestige, and income. This system is believed to motivate individuals to work hard and strive for success in order to attain higher social positions.
What are the theoretical perspectives of social stratification?
The main theoretical perspectives of social stratification are structural-functionalism, which sees stratification as necessary for society to function efficiently; conflict theory, which views stratification as a result of competition for scarce resources; and symbolic interactionism, which emphasizes how individual interactions contribute to the maintenance of stratification. Other perspectives include feminist theory, which examines how gender intersects with stratification, and intersectionality, which considers how multiple social identities interact to shape an individual's position in society.
Is social stratification is inevitable?
Social stratification is can be refer to as division of a society into layers according τ☺ their property, prestige and power. And also involved ranking of group of people.
What are the determinant of social stratification?
The key determinants of social stratification are economic, social and political policies.
What are the five basic characteristics of social stratification?
The five basic characteristics of social stratification are: a) Ancient Stratification / The Antiquity of Social stratification b) The Ubiquity of Stratification c) The Social Patterning of Stratification d) The Diversity of Form and Amount of Stratification e) The Consequences of Stratification
What are the negative impacts of stratification?
Stratification can lead to inequality in access to resources, opportunities, and social status, which can result in social unrest, discrimination, and lack of upward mobility. It can also perpetuate stereotypes and prejudice against certain social groups, leading to further divisions within society.
What describes a way in which the specialization of jobs in development of social stratification in early societies were?
Both appeared as a result of the Neolithic Revolution.
Do you agree that Marx theory of social stratification is also a theory of social change and why?
Social change would imply a differance in the social classes from the time Marx defined the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat classes ,so in a sense yes, we now have the all but diverse and ever growing middle class.
Who gain the least from stratification?
The lower classes have the least to gain from social stratification.
