Cultural Relativism is actually a problem. While it may be impossible to know exactly which moral positions are the best, it is clear that certain moral positions are better than others. Killing the victims of rape is not a good way to treat women, even if such an act is praticed in over twenty countries. Beating people who disagree with your political or religious views is not a good way to treat others, even if such an act is practiced in dozens of countries. The values enshrined in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights should be enforced for all people in all places regardless of the problems with normative culture.
The strengths of cultural relativismNow that we have looked at the central claims of cultural relativism with an analytical eye, let's turn to considering its strengths explicitly.· It encourages respect and tolerance for all cultures and societies· By extension, it advocates for equality among and between cultures· It encourages a sense of unity within a culture by maintaining that all are bound by the same rules· It provides an appropriate set of "rules" for all within that culture to obey and for outsiders to conform to, once they step within the bounds of that culture· It warns us against assuming that all of our own cultural practices are based on some "absolute rational standard".(Rachels, p 30)· It stresses the benefits of keeping an open mind and not rushing to judgment.The weaknesses of cultural relativismAre there weaknesses within cultural relativism as well? Probably.It has been argued that the weaknesses of cultural relativism include:· By accepting that all cultures are equal and none are superior or inferior, we prevent people from protesting against harmful practices either inside or outside their own societies.Some examples include:o The Chinese who argued against their own government in the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989o The Americans who protested against their own country's involvement in the Vietnam war ando The Poles of the Solidarity movement who argued against their government's closing of the shipyards in Gdansk.If we accept that a culture is right for all its members, these protesters would have had no moral or ethical principles to support their calls for justice.Few people would however accept this line of reasoning and many applaud the bravery of those who protested and, in the Tiananmen Square uprising in particular, lost their lives.· Negating the idea of moral progressSocieties evolve, adapt and adjust, often in search of more fairness and justice for all.Because some analytical and critical thinkers saw that slavery, racism and colonisation were not in the best interests of all and were actively doing harm to some members of society, these practices have been increasingly abolished or at least discouraged throughout the 20th century.Most would agree that these changes have benefited societies and humanity. However, such changes would not have been encouraged or achieved if a narrow view of cultural relativism had prevailed.
Some people may hold stereotypes or discriminatory beliefs against rednecks, often based on assumptions about their lifestyle, education, or cultural practices. It is important to remember that discrimination against any group of people is harmful and unfair.
Factors that have encouraged cultural contacts include advancements in communication technology, ease of travel, globalization, and increasing interest in cultural diversity. Factors that have created barriers to cultural contacts include language barriers, political conflicts, discrimination, and cultural stereotypes.
Some examples of cultural isolation include communities that are cut off from the rest of society due to geographic barriers, like remote islands or secluded mountain regions. Additionally, strict religious or cultural practices that restrict interactions with outsiders can also lead to cultural isolation. Finally, certain marginalized groups, such as indigenous communities or refugees, may experience cultural isolation due to discrimination and lack of access to mainstream society.
Some examples of culture-specific syndromes include susto (Latin America), koro (Asia), and zar (North Africa/Middle East). These syndromes are believed to be influenced by cultural beliefs and practices and may present with unique symptoms and treatment approaches within specific cultural contexts.
cultural relativism.
It is possible that you may die.
There are none.
Some key anthropological concepts include culture (shared beliefs and practices of a group), ethnography (the study and description of specific cultures), cultural relativism (understanding other cultures without judging them against your own), and ethnocentrism (viewing one's own culture as superior to others).
Religious. They said it was a sin against humanity.
look for it in the book :D
The strengths of cultural relativismNow that we have looked at the central claims of cultural relativism with an analytical eye, let's turn to considering its strengths explicitly.· It encourages respect and tolerance for all cultures and societies· By extension, it advocates for equality among and between cultures· It encourages a sense of unity within a culture by maintaining that all are bound by the same rules· It provides an appropriate set of "rules" for all within that culture to obey and for outsiders to conform to, once they step within the bounds of that culture· It warns us against assuming that all of our own cultural practices are based on some "absolute rational standard".(Rachels, p 30)· It stresses the benefits of keeping an open mind and not rushing to judgment.The weaknesses of cultural relativismAre there weaknesses within cultural relativism as well? Probably.It has been argued that the weaknesses of cultural relativism include:· By accepting that all cultures are equal and none are superior or inferior, we prevent people from protesting against harmful practices either inside or outside their own societies.Some examples include:o The Chinese who argued against their own government in the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989o The Americans who protested against their own country's involvement in the Vietnam war ando The Poles of the Solidarity movement who argued against their government's closing of the shipyards in Gdansk.If we accept that a culture is right for all its members, these protesters would have had no moral or ethical principles to support their calls for justice.Few people would however accept this line of reasoning and many applaud the bravery of those who protested and, in the Tiananmen Square uprising in particular, lost their lives.· Negating the idea of moral progressSocieties evolve, adapt and adjust, often in search of more fairness and justice for all.Because some analytical and critical thinkers saw that slavery, racism and colonisation were not in the best interests of all and were actively doing harm to some members of society, these practices have been increasingly abolished or at least discouraged throughout the 20th century.Most would agree that these changes have benefited societies and humanity. However, such changes would not have been encouraged or achieved if a narrow view of cultural relativism had prevailed.
Some arguments against protecting endangered species include the belief that resources should be focused on more imminent human needs, such as poverty alleviation or healthcare. Some individuals also argue that extinction is a natural process that has occurred throughout Earth's history. Additionally, there are concerns about the economic impacts of protecting endangered species, such as restrictions on land use for agriculture or development.
They both make judgments based on an individual's perception.
Some of the arguments against internet voting include security risks, electronic and human errors.
In college fights, verbal arguments are the mainly used against either party. Some argument topics include dates, friendships, rumors and competitions.
Arguments for comparable worth stress that individuals who have the same value at an organization should receive the same compensation, regardless of gender. Arguments against comparable worth emphasize that some jobs can be undervalued.