0
What are the weaknesses of Weber's view of social stratification?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
It consists of three main indicators: class, status and party. Class is similar to Marx's conception except that Weber focuses on access to produce rather than ownership of means of production. Status refers to the social prestige accorded to individuals according to their type of lifestyle (which is in turn determined by things such as income and Party can be thought of as power/authority, whereby there is a hierarchical division based on appointment or anything that is neither economic nor social, e.g. a group leader. Undergirding this idea of stratification is how all these three components affect one's life chances, or one's ability to exercise power - defined as the will of oneself to realize one's goals even against the resistance of others. Hence, this revolves very much around social action, which is typically Weberian.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Some weaknesses of Weber's view of social stratification include the complexity of his classification system, which can make it difficult to apply in practice. The emphasis on individual attributes and achievements may overlook the role of structural and systemic factors in perpetuating inequality. Additionally, Weber's focus on status and power may not fully account for the intersectionality of multiple social identities that contribute to stratification.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What view reflects social-conflict theorists' ideas about social stratification?
Social inequality reflects the social-conflict theorists ideas about social stratification.
How do the functionalist and conflict explanations of stratification differ?
Functionalists view stratification as necessary for maintaining social order and stability, with each social position serving a specific function in society. Conflict theorists, on the other hand, see stratification as resulting from competition and inequality among different social groups, with the dominant group using their power to maintain control and suppress the lower classes.
Why did Davis and Moore conclude that stratification is inevitable?
Davis and Moore proposed that stratification is inevitable in society because they believe that it is functional and necessary for the smooth functioning of society. They argue that stratification helps ensure that the most qualified individuals hold the most important positions in society, leading to greater efficiency and stability. In their view, stratification is a mechanism for ensuring that the most talented and skilled individuals are incentivized to occupy the most critical roles in society.
What are social-conflict theorists looking for when they view modern society?
If inequalities exist as a result of social stratifcation.
How does a functionalist view social welfare?
Functionalists view social welfare as a system that provides support for individuals in society, ensuring social stability and cohesion. They see it as a mechanism to address social inequalities and maintain the overall functioning of society by meeting the needs of its members.
What view reflects social-conflict theorists' ideas about social stratification?
Social inequality reflects the social-conflict theorists ideas about social stratification.
What view reflects Karl Marx perspective on social stratification?
Workers would eventually overthrow the upper class
How did weber view of social class differ from marx?
Weber believed that social class was based on a combination of factors such as wealth, power, and prestige, while Marx focused mainly on economic factors like ownership of the means of production. Weber also emphasized the role of status groups and parties in shaping social stratification, in addition to economic inequality. Overall, Weber's view of social class was more multifaceted and multidimensional compared to Marx's more economically centered perspective.
What should a do about problems with an argument?
Admit and talk about the weaknesses in a point of view
When you are writing a persuasive argument what's the best way to deal with potential criticism of the weaknesses in your argument?
Address potential weaknesses in your argument upfront by acknowledging and refuting them within your argument. Strengthen your argument by using counterarguments and evidence to support your points. Show that you have considered different perspectives and have a well-rounded understanding of the topic.
When you are writing a persuasive argument what's the best way to deal potential criticism of the weaknesses in your argument?
Acknowledge and address the weaknesses of your point of view
What should a writer do about problems with a argument?
Admit and talk about the weaknesses in a point of view
What should a writer do about problems with an argument?
Admit and talk about the weaknesses in a point of view
Of the 1.3 billion people living in poverty around the world, 70 percent are women. Sociologists view this as evidence of what?
(For Apex Learning) Gender stratification.
What is the best way to deal with possible criticism of an argument?
Admit and talk about the weaknesses in a point of view
Yahoo messenger social view plug in error?
an error occurred while trying to access the social view plug-in
How should a writer deal with possible with possible criticism of an argument?
Admit and talk about the weaknesses in a point of view
