From a conflict perspective, deviance refers to behaviors or actions that go against the norms and values of a society, often resulting from power struggles and inequalities within the society. Deviance is seen as a form of resistance by marginalized groups against the dominant social order and structures that perpetuate oppression and injustice. Conflict theorists argue that deviance challenges authority and serves as a means for the disenfranchised to assert their agency and demand social change.
The relativity of deviance is most aligned with the symbolic interactionist perspective in sociology. This perspective emphasizes that deviance is socially constructed and can vary among different societies and groups. Perspectives like functionalism and conflict theory focus more on the impact of deviance on social order and power dynamics.
C. Symbolic interactionist perspective explains the relativity of deviance by emphasizing how individuals construct meanings and interpretations of behaviors through social interactions. This perspective focuses on the subjective nature of deviance and how it is defined and labeled within specific cultural contexts.
The conflict perspective in sociology focuses on why rule violation persists in societies despite efforts to maintain order. This perspective highlights how power dynamics, inequalities, and social structures contribute to deviant behavior and shape the responses to it. It emphasizes how deviance can be a form of resistance to dominant norms and values.
Conflict theorists regard power and social inequality as the main characteristics of society. They stress that the power elite uses the criminal justice system to protect its position of power and privilege. From this perspective, the law is an instrument of oppression used by the powerful to maintain their position of privilege. The ruling class uses the criminal justice system to punish the crimes of the poor while diverting its own criminal activities away from this punitive system.
The relativity of deviance is most aligned with the symbolic interactionist perspective because it emphasizes how societal definitions of what is considered deviant can vary across different cultures, contexts, and situations. Symbolic interactionism focuses on how individuals interpret and define social situations, including what is considered normal or deviant behavior. This perspective highlights the importance of understanding how people construct and negotiate meanings of deviance in their interactions with others.
The relativity of deviance is most aligned with the symbolic interactionist perspective in sociology. This perspective emphasizes that deviance is socially constructed and can vary among different societies and groups. Perspectives like functionalism and conflict theory focus more on the impact of deviance on social order and power dynamics.
C. Symbolic interactionist perspective explains the relativity of deviance by emphasizing how individuals construct meanings and interpretations of behaviors through social interactions. This perspective focuses on the subjective nature of deviance and how it is defined and labeled within specific cultural contexts.
The four definitional perspectives in contemporary criminology are consensus perspective, conflict perspective, interactionist perspective, and developmental perspective. The consensus perspective focuses on shared values and beliefs within society, the conflict perspective highlights power differentials and inequalities, the interactionist perspective examines how individuals interpret and respond to labels and symbols of deviance, and the developmental perspective looks at how individuals change over the life course in terms of criminal behavior.
conflict perspective
The conflict perspective in sociology focuses on why rule violation persists in societies despite efforts to maintain order. This perspective highlights how power dynamics, inequalities, and social structures contribute to deviant behavior and shape the responses to it. It emphasizes how deviance can be a form of resistance to dominant norms and values.
Conflict theorists regard power and social inequality as the main characteristics of society. They stress that the power elite uses the criminal justice system to protect its position of power and privilege. From this perspective, the law is an instrument of oppression used by the powerful to maintain their position of privilege. The ruling class uses the criminal justice system to punish the crimes of the poor while diverting its own criminal activities away from this punitive system.
The relativity of deviance is most aligned with the symbolic interactionist perspective because it emphasizes how societal definitions of what is considered deviant can vary across different cultures, contexts, and situations. Symbolic interactionism focuses on how individuals interpret and define social situations, including what is considered normal or deviant behavior. This perspective highlights the importance of understanding how people construct and negotiate meanings of deviance in their interactions with others.
The way people respond to deviance has several implications with the law. If deviance is responded to morally, the deviant could spend time in jail. If the matter is approached criminally, the outcome is usually a psychiatric institution.
conflict perspective
The conflict perspective reflects a macro-level approach, focusing on how inequality and power imbalances within society contribute to conflicts between different groups. This perspective views society as a system where conflict is inevitable due to competition over resources and power. By analyzing these structural forces, the conflict perspective seeks to understand the underlying reasons for conflict within society.
The conflict and consensus perspective on education tends to view in school and intuition that perpetuate.
Heinous crimes often belong in the conflict theory of deviance, which emphasizes how power differentials and social inequality can drive individuals to commit such extreme acts. Conflict theorists argue that heinous crimes can be understood as a response to societal injustices and power struggles.