It depends on how the word "accurate" is defined.
If "accurate" refers to a Social Darwinist defense of US Imperialism that was the most consistent with reality and empirically correct, there is no such animal. Social Darwinism is a thoroughly inaccurate description of reality and its defense of imperialism were based on this. It would be like asking, "What aspects of map-making were accurately predicted by Flat-Earth Theory?"
If "accurate" refers to whether an argument is properly attributed to Social Darwinists in defense of US Imperialism, the most accurate such argument would be that according to the Social Darwinist, Imperialism was the natural expansion and success of a well-evolved culture and this expansion would help remove or improve underperforming cultures.
Social Darwinism held that those made better or worse by industrialization were based on the natural predisposition of the people effected. For those who were made better off, the success of those people demonstrated that they had a well-evolved culture and this expansion would help remove or improve underperforming cultures, which were those "chosen" by the fact that they were performing poorly.
Nations that considered themselves superior felt obliged to govern less-advanced nations.
It is most likely Socal Security or the Defense budget.
Recording it carefully, so that the data is complete and accurate.
The gov spends the most money on health and human services which account for programs like welfare and temporary aid for needy families and the like. That cost about $900 billion a year, then its social security and then its defense. So we spend more on social programs then we do on defense.
One reason for imperialism was social Darwinism; this theory means that sociology and politics was a reserve for those considered to be naturally selected and fit to survive (natural selection and survival of the fittest).
the most accurate estimate is arround 100 million per year so basicly, if you buy a used car it had a baby born in it.
Government is most closely associated with imperialism.
Nationalism
Africa
The division of the African continent was the most harmful political legacy of African imperialism.
Imperialism
yes! Imperialism
In a nutshell, wealth. But also geopolitical advantage (lands from which to mount military defense or offensives). And finally and most interestingly the cultural attitudes, arts, etc of the conquered tend to have a positive effect on their conqueror.
What is most accurate about communication
aggressive defense
The US was the most productive country in the world. It produced many things and needed to sell them.
japan
Gandhi defied British Imperialism, first in South Africa, and then in his native India for most of his adult life.