Suppose the result for each game is independent of the results of earlier games and the probability of a win in any game is the constant, p, then the answer is
16C3*p13*(1-p)3 where 16C3 = 16*15*14/(3*2*1)
However, the assumption of constant and independent probability of a win is rubbish.
Suppose the result for each game is independent of the results of earlier games and the probability of a win in any game is the constant, p, then the answer is
16C3*p13*(1-p)3 where 16C3 = 16*15*14/(3*2*1)
However, the assumption of constant and independent probability of a win is rubbish.
Suppose the result for each game is independent of the results of earlier games and the probability of a win in any game is the constant, p, then the answer is
16C3*p13*(1-p)3 where 16C3 = 16*15*14/(3*2*1)
However, the assumption of constant and independent probability of a win is rubbish.
Suppose the result for each game is independent of the results of earlier games and the probability of a win in any game is the constant, p, then the answer is
16C3*p13*(1-p)3 where 16C3 = 16*15*14/(3*2*1)
However, the assumption of constant and independent probability of a win is rubbish.
The probability of having 13 wins and 3 losses in 16 games depends on the success rate of winning each game. If each game is independent and the probability of winning is constant, you can calculate it using the binomial distribution formula. With the information provided, you can use the formula (P(X = k) = \binom{n}{k} \times p^k \times (1-p)^{n-k}), where n = 16, k = 13, and p is the probability of winning each game.
Suppose the result for each game is independent of the results of earlier games and the probability of a win in any game is the constant, p, then the answer is
16C3*p13*(1-p)3 where 16C3 = 16*15*14/(3*2*1)
However, the assumption of constant and independent probability of a win is rubbish.
Whose definition of a social problem wins depends largely upon the dominant societal values, beliefs, and power structures in a given society. Those in positions of authority and influence are often able to shape and label what is considered a social problem, influencing public perception and policy decisions.
If no candidate for the presidency wins a simple majority of the total number of electoral votes, the decision is made by the U.S. House of Representatives. Each state delegation in the House gets one vote to choose the president from the three candidates with the most electoral votes.
The most common electoral system used in general elections in the US is the plurality voting system, also known as first-past-the-post. In this system, the candidate with the most votes wins, even if they do not have an absolute majority.
British leaders, such as the Prime Minister, are chosen through a general election where the political party with the most seats in the House of Commons usually forms the government. The leader of the winning party becomes the Prime Minister. Alternatively, if no party wins a majority, a coalition government may be formed.
Pros: Ensures that the candidate with the most votes across the entire country wins the election, potentially reducing disparities between the popular vote and electoral college outcome. Cons: Could lead to campaigns focusing only on large population centers and neglecting smaller states, potentially disenfranchising voters in less populous areas.
Subtract losses from wins.A team that has 25 wins and 30 losses is (30 - 25) = 5 games "under .500".Subtract wins from losses to find the number of games over .500.
91 wins + 24 losses = 115 games% wins = 91/115 * 100% = 79.13%% losses = 24/115 * 100% =20.87%=======================total ---------------------------100%
For 2009, 95 wins, 67 losses.
Suppose Team A is in first place and you want to know how many games back Team B is. Compute the following: (Wins for A)+(Losses for B)-(Losses for A)-(Wins for B), and divide the result by two. See how it works: If A and B play each other and A wins, then (Wins for A) and (Losses for B) both go up by one, so the number of games behind increases by one; likewise, if B wins, (Losses for A) and (Wins for B) increase, so the number of games behind decreases by one.
It depends on whether the odds are in favour or against. Generally, the odds refer to a wins versus b losses. That is a wins out of a total number of a+b outcomes and so a probability of winning = a/(a+b).
John Davidson played 41 games (20 wins, 15 losses, 4 ties) Steve Baker played 27 games (9 wins, 8 losses, 6 ties) Wayne Thomas played 12 games (4 wins, 7 losses) Doug Soetaert played 8 games (5 wins, 2 losses) All played as goalie for the New York Rangers during the 1979-1980 season. *note multiple goalies can play in the same game, therefore wins and losses do not always add up to the number of games played.
3:8
.560 for 9 wins 5 losses and .500 for 8 wins 4 losses and 2 ties.
97 65 Wins Losses
4 wins, 12 losses
Their current career record is 126 wins to 149 losses.
I think it's Ferret University.