Yeomen and poor whites shared similarities in their socioeconomic status, working as small farmers and laborers. They often struggled financially and were not part of the elite class. Both groups faced challenges related to land ownership and social status in their communities.
Virginians kept relations friendly with poor whites by promoting a sense of racial solidarity and emphasizing shared interests and values. This often involved messaging that reinforced the idea of a common enemy—such as the wealthy elite or people of color—as a way to unite poor whites with the broader white community in Virginia. Additionally, providing economic opportunities and social support to poor whites helped maintain goodwill and cooperation among different socioeconomic groups in the state.
Slave owners feared poor whites because they were seen as competition for labor resources. Poor whites could potentially undermine the hierarchical structure of society by forming alliances with slaves to challenge the institution of slavery. Additionally, poor whites posed a threat to the economic interests of slave owners by demanding higher wages or better working conditions.
The rich Virginians kept relations friendly with poor whites by providing economic opportunities, such as jobs and land. They also used social events and cultural institutions to foster a sense of community. Additionally, they emphasized racial solidarity to prevent poor whites from aligning with enslaved Africans.
Slaves were owned as property, had no rights, and were subjected to brutal living and working conditions. Poor whites, while still disadvantaged, had the potential to earn wages and had some basic legal rights as free individuals. Additionally, poor whites were not subject to the same level of dehumanization and exploitation that enslaved individuals experienced.
The lives of plantation belt yeomen and upcountry yeomen diverged due to differences in economic opportunities and lifestyles. Plantation belt yeomen were typically wealthier and relied on cash crops like cotton, while upcountry yeomen focused on subsistence farming and lived in more isolated, rugged areas. Additionally, the plantation system in the South created a more stratified society that impacted opportunities for social mobility.
yeomen
I think that some of the Yeoman did not like the slavery along with the poor whites because Yeoman owned few slaves or none at all and the poor whites survived by hunting, fishing, raising small gardens, and doing odd jobs.
Southern Baptist
The different groups that made up Southern society include,the planters, the yeomen farmers, the poor whites, the slaves, and free African Americans.
The different groups that made up Southern society include,the planters, the yeomen farmers, the poor whites, the slaves, and free African Americans.
Poor whites in the American colonies.
Yeomen did not own slaves and were poor while plantation owners were rich and owned many slaves.
Poor whites shared a common interest with upper-class whites in maintaining social control over blacks.
They allowed poor whites the use of their skilled slaves.
they allowed poor whites the use of their plantation barns use plantation barns They allowed poor whites the use of their skilled slaves
Poor whites shared a common interest with upper-class whites in maintaining social control over blacks.
they allowed poor whites the use of their plantation barns use plantation barns They allowed poor whites the use of their skilled slaves