It is less likely for them to work they only go to school to educate but laws there was very strict they smack you with a CANE.
One key figure who improved the lives of poor Victorian children was Dr. Thomas Barnardo. He established the charity Dr. Barnardo's, which provided shelter, education, and opportunities for disadvantaged children. Barnardo's work helped to address issues of child poverty and exploitation during the Victorian era.
Life for poor Victorian children was often harsh, characterized by poverty, overcrowded housing, malnutrition, lack of education, and long hours of labor in factories or mines. Many children had to work to help support their families, facing dangerous conditions and low wages. They had limited access to proper healthcare or sanitation, leading to high rates of illness and mortality.
Poor Victorian children faced harsh living conditions, often living in overcrowded and unsanitary slums. Many were forced to work long hours in factories or as chimney sweeps to help support their families. Education was limited, and basic necessities like food, clothing, and shelter were often lacking.
Yes, wealthy families in the Victorian Era often employed servants who would assist with housekeeping, cooking, and childcare. Children from affluent families would have servants to attend to their needs and care for them.
Victorian children were taught basic literacy and numeracy at home, often by a governess or tutor. They also learned etiquette, religious studies, and moral values. Girls were typically educated in domestic skills like sewing and cooking.
Rich children then were rich because they worked. They lived like children nowadays - with parents.
No, not all Victorian children had to work. If your parents were rich then you didn't have to go to work wereas the poorer families including children had to just to keep a roof over their head.
The same way that people are rich today. either by sheer hard work, or inherited.
They were rich and they were childeren
Children living in Britain during Victorian times, were either rich or poor. If they were poor, they often had to work to help out the family.
yes it is used by rich and poor children from the Victorian times
Rich Victorian children often had an opportunity not afforded to poor children. They often received an education while poor children worked in the factories.
A diabolo was generally used by rich Victorian children because they had access to toys available in shops.
olivia
they worked- poor children went to school- rich children
in grand houses
yes