Families in the lower class often face barriers such as limited access to education, lower levels of income, and lack of economic opportunities, which can contribute to their continued presence in the lower class. Systemic issues such as inequality, discrimination, and limited social mobility also play a role in perpetuating this cycle.
The upper class had more wealth, social status, and privileges compared to the lower class. They often had better access to education, healthcare, and opportunities for advancement. The lower class typically had less economic resources, limited social mobility, and fewer advantages in society.
broken families? divorced families? two married adults and children? which sex marriage? same, different? on welfare or public assistance when perfectly capable of working? drug addicted parents? alcoholic parents? Generally speaking, a single parent family is much more likely to be financially stressed than one which has two parents (whether those parents are married is statistically irrelevant, the important thing is to have two caretaker adults). Single-parent families are much less likely to survive a financial crisis (layoff, major illness, etc.). In addition, those with less education have children at an earlier age than those with large amounts of education, and education correlates strongly with income level. Lower education parents also tend to have more children per family, which increases the financial strain. So, overall, those with less education (and less earning potential) are more likely to create a family earlier on, have bigger families, be single parents, and are prone to financial collapse from random (but likely) events.
Urban society in America typically consisted of a combination of upper class, middle class, and lower class individuals. The upper class included wealthy professionals, business owners, and influential families. The middle class encompassed white-collar workers, managers, and skilled laborers. The lower class oftentimes comprised blue-collar workers, service industry employees, and individuals living in poverty.
A family's social class position can influence the values, beliefs, and opportunities available to children, which in turn shapes how they are socialized. Children from higher social class families may be socialized to value education and professional success, while children from lower social class families may be socialized to prioritize resilience and resourcefulness in the face of economic challenges. Additionally, social class can impact the types of networks and experiences children are exposed to, influencing their socialization process.
Children from lower class backgrounds often face numerous challenges such as limited access to resources like books and tutoring, unstable home environments, and higher levels of stress. Additionally, lower class children may attend schools with fewer resources and experienced teachers, which can further impact their academic performance. socio-economic factors can greatly impact a child's ability to succeed in school.
Yes, he does want to lower middle class families tax.
Depends on their income. Just like any other worker's.
Lower class families, preferably the unskilled workers family, did most of their activities on the roof.
No, not nessasarily. Some middle class girls familys are stricter and expect more from them but some lower class girls family expect a lot from them because they want them to grow up right and make good decisions that with eventually lead to a good future.In general, that would be NO. Lower-class children (of both sexes) are much more likely to live in a single-parent household. Single-parent households average significantly less supervision of children, as the sole adult is employed as a breadwinner, and thus has very little time for child supervision. Even in lower-class families with two parents, both almost certainly work (if possible).Overall, the probability that a family has one parent available to supervise children (i.e at least one parent works either as a homemaker or part-time, at most) is much greater in middle class families than in lower class families.
No, not nessasarily. Some middle class girls familys are stricter and expect more from them but some lower class girls family expect a lot from them because they want them to grow up right and make good decisions that with eventually lead to a good future.In general, that would be NO. Lower-class children (of both sexes) are much more likely to live in a single-parent household. Single-parent households average significantly less supervision of children, as the sole adult is employed as a breadwinner, and thus has very little time for child supervision. Even in lower-class families with two parents, both almost certainly work (if possible).Overall, the probability that a family has one parent available to supervise children (i.e at least one parent works either as a homemaker or part-time, at most) is much greater in middle class families than in lower class families.
there are numerous kinds if looked for. but generally there are three kind of families 1)rich families with joint family members 2)middle class families with their religious beliefs 3)lower class families with extremely narrow minded thoughts
Plebeians - more to the lower class/lower middle class Equestrians - middle class only
It was a campaign promise that he made, and he kept it with two tax cuts that mainly benefited the middle class.
The Beatles were from lower-middle and lower class families in the English port city of Liverpool. This is probably a different culture if you are an Eskimo or a Shinto priest or a cowboy on the pampas. It is not a different culture if you are from a lower-middle or lower class family from Liverpool.
In ancient Rome, the Patricians were the elite class of noble families. They were supported by the Plebians, who were of the lower and middle classes.
They are in the same Class but different Orders. (Also different Families and Genera, which are lower subdivisions.)
The lower class colonists didn't have much education, only enough to live on a farm and read the Bible. Some of them were educated by their parents, others went to school houses, but education was not as important back then. Rich families could hire private tutors and had more education than the lower class.