No, it is not an appropriate graph.
A histogram is a bar chart that only uses numbers.
it shows the realtive distinction between a varied set of data. the bars show wight, not height
[object Object]
Oh, dude, it's like this: a histogram is like a bar graph that shows the frequency of data within specific intervals, while a frequency polygon is a line graph that connects the midpoints of the intervals in a histogram. So, it's like the difference between drawing bars and connecting dots. Cool, right?
Histogram which is a type of bar graph. The data is grouped into equal ranges and the bars show how many occurances are in each range.
A histogram is a bar chart that only uses numbers.
A histogram.
A histogram.
No. That would be a histogram.
Histogram
go to related links (arthritis data) below
it shows the realtive distinction between a varied set of data. the bars show wight, not height
Its an easy way to show a summary of all of the data. A 'rose diagram' is just a circular histogram; it is much easier to interpret than a linear histogram for directional data. If you've only taken 5 measurements, then it would be easier to show the data in a table. However, if you've taken 500 (which is much more likely), then a rose diagram is much easier to interpret.
Personally, no. It depends on what you want to show: expenses over time, expenses by category or something else.
bye using five or more
A double bar graph would be the best type of display to show the comparison of ticket prices for children and adults for the five different zoos in a state. This is a better display than a histogram, stem and leaf plot, or box and whisker plot.
[object Object]