0
Creation
Whether you believe God created the world or the universe is the result of the Big Bang, ask questions here about the creation of the beautiful and wondrous earth we live on.
2,055 Questions
What is creationism vs evolution?
This debate has been going on for a long time: Some people believe that we were made by a higher being, others believe that we evolved from primates. It depends on what your perspective (view) is.
What is the difference between creationism and evolutionary theory?
Evolution is a scientific theory explaining the diversity of modern life. The various forms of creationism are religious beliefs, usually inspired by ancient myths captured in religious scriptures.
Do you believe in the theory of creation?
As a machine learning model, I don't have personal beliefs. The theory of creation is a matter of individual faith and interpretation, with some beliefs attributing the origins of the universe to a divine creator or higher power. Scientists generally rely on evidence-based explanations like the Big Bang theory to understand the origins of the universe.
What is the major conflict between evolution and creationism?
Conflict is a strong word! It implies, at the very least, a robust debate about the origins of the world, yet it seems that outside the resources of creationists, there is very little discussion.
Certainly, few scientists are concerned with whether some believe in some form of special creation. Very few scientists, apart from Richard Dawkins, even discuss creationism. As a Professor for Public Understanding of Science (now emeritus), it was Dawkins' proper role to explain science against a creationist argument.
So, the conflict, if that is the right word, is generated by creationists and kept alive in creationist publications and internet posts, to maintain awareness of their belief that God created the world more or less as we see it now, either over a period of billions of years or just a few thousand years.
What is the definition of creationism?
Creationism is the belief that life and the universe were created by a supernatural being, typically in the religious sense, rather than through natural processes like evolution. Creationism often rejects scientific explanations for the origin of life and promotes the idea of a divine creator.
Cilia help to move substances across the surface of a cell. They can either help propel fluids over the cell's surface, as in the respiratory tract, or help move the cell itself, as in the case of sperm cells. They also play a role in sensory functions in some cells.
How was the first living thing created?
Having used the word "created" in the question, the theory of evolution is negated in the answer. Only one answer exists then: God called it into existence. It in this case was "the heavens," which by the original text specifically means literally space, as in distance and the potential for location.
Creationism is not considered scientifically accurate because it is based on religious beliefs rather than empirical evidence. It does not align with the overwhelming scientific consensus that evolution is the best explanation for the diversity of life on Earth, as supported by extensive research in fields like genetics, paleontology, and biology. Creationism is not falsifiable or testable in the same way that scientific theories are.
Are there atheist scientists arguing against evolution?
Yes. A few examples are Jerry Fodor, Massimo Palmarini, Michael Behe, and Thomas Nagel, among others.
Evolution is fraught with difficulties and it remains in fact a theory, open to dispute by people who choose to avoid ignoring its problems. It can neither be proven nor demonstrated in the lab (in its broader sense of giving rise to new organs or species).
How did evolution flunk the science test?
The question does not specify the science test that evolution supposedly failed. In fact, evolution is the most fundamental part of modern biology, which of course is science. So much so it is hard to imagine the proper study of biology without an understanding of evolution.
Those who wish, for religious reasons, evolution were not true do propose a whole range of tests they believe evolution fails but these are theological tests, not science tests. In other instances they point to what they believe to be flaws in the Theory of Evolution, but in doing so highlight their inadequate knowledge of science.
Why does evolution disprove creationism?
Creationism basically promotes an essentialist notion: the notion that life is static and lifeforms unchanging. The facts show that life is continually diverging, stemming from common ancestors. This disproves the notion of special creation of modern lifeforms, and the notion that such lifeforms are essentially unchanging.
Why do evolutionists hate creationism?
The reaction of societies to creationism is a complex one. While in itself creationism might have been just another subculture of various mainstream religions, the fanaticism with which creationists oppose the advancement of science and education through political means has caused a reactionary response in the more scientifically literate part of the populations of Western countries. One might idealistically claim to be opposed to creationist activism rather than to creationism itself, but the human mind is usually not that subtle, often resulting in a hateful stance towards the entirety of everything to do with creationism.
How do you be an evolutionist?
To be an evolutionist, you simply need to accept the scientific theory of evolution, which explains how species change and develop over time through the process of natural selection and genetic variation. This involves understanding and acknowledging the evidence supporting evolution as the mechanism for the diversity of life on Earth.
Should evolution and creationism be taught side by side in school?
Most certainly not side-by-side. That would imply that they are equivalent notions. Evolution, however, is a scientific theory, and creationism is religious myth. Evolution belongs in biology classes, creationism in something like comparative religion courses.
What is a young earth creationist?
A Young-Earth Creationist believes that the world and living things were created within the last several thousand years, without need for gradual evolution.See also:
Is there evidence against Evolution
What are the pros and cons of creationism and evolutionism?
Creationism asserts a religious explanation for the origin of life, providing a sense of purpose and meaning for believers. However, it lacks scientific evidence and contradicts established scientific theories. Evolutionism is supported by scientific evidence and explains the diversity of life forms through natural selection, but it may conflict with religious beliefs for some individuals.
Does creationism disprove adaptation?
No, creationism and adaptation are not mutually exclusive concepts. Creationism is a belief in a divine creator, while adaptation is a scientific process by which organisms change over time to better survive in their environment. Many people believe that adaptation is evidence of intelligent design by a divine creator.
How is intelligent design different from creationism?
Intelligent Design is a line of subjective argumentation within creationism, which generally implies the following flow of deduction:
1. The universe is complex from a macro to a micro scale, therefore there is an intelligent designer/creator.
The Scientific Response:
The fact that the universe is complex in no way infers that a creator or designer is responsible for it.
2. The universe had a beginning, and a beginning must have a cause outside of itself.
The Scientific Response:
In Indo-German languages (which includes English) a verb must have a subject, and thus an effect must have an independent cause. It is therefore tempting to assume that this grammatical rule is also a law of nature - but it is not.
Quantum theory has proven that objective observation is impossible (i.e. that observing an effect actually influences it - the Heisenberg Principle), and that all matter and energy in the universe is interconnected, with quantum "wavicles" spontaneously arising and dissapearing. This concept is very counter-intuitive to human beings because within our limited scope of perception things appear to be very different. Modern quantum physics has solid theories backed up by decades of research that can explain a universe giving rise to itself. Creationism only offers a subjective deduction without any solid research or evidence that would withstand scientific scrutiny.
3. The creator of the universe is an intelligent designer who exactly and only fits the description of the God of the Bible
The Scientific Response:
Creationism offers no objective rationale for this statement, its largest leap of deduction: it is one thing to argue that the universe was created (i.e. Deism) than to state that this creator would exactly and only correspond to that of one belief system among many (i.e. Theism), on a single planet, orbiting a common yellow dwarf, in the extremis of a single spiral of a galaxy among billions of galaxies in the universe.
What are some differences between Young-Earth creationism and Old-Earth creationism?
A Young-Earth creationist steadfastly refuses to accept the scientific evidence for the age of the earth and insists that God created the earth only a few thousand years ago. An Old-Earth creationist accepts the scientific evidence for the age of the earth but insists that God created the earth and all living things.
Both are trying to reconcile their understanding of the Book of Genesis with the real world around us, but the Old-Earth creationist is perhaps a little more flexible and takes a more realistic approach. This leaves him with the dilemma of how to explain Genesis chapter 1, which says the world was created in just six days. The most common attempt at explanation is to suggest that the 'days' were not days in our understanding, but very long periods of time, an explanation that can only be described as full of holes.
Both tend to conflate the first creation account (Genesis 1:1-2:4a) with the second creation account (Genesis 2:4bff), treating the second creation account as the fuller description of the creation of man, from the first account. Here, a generally unrecognised problem for the Old-Earth creationist is that the biblical genealogy of Adam only allows the earth to be around six thousand years old, with no benefit achieved from the semantic arguments about just how long a biblical 'day' was.
For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
How is fundamentalism at odds with the teaching of evolution?
Most religious creation myths teach that human beings (and every other form of life), were created specially, separate from all the others, for a particular divine purpose.
Evolutionary theory does not award the human race (or any other kind of life) with a special position. Each and every living thing is the end product, the summum, of a long history of surviving common ancestors, producing diverging lineages. According to evolutionary theory, we're special not because of our origins, but because of the characteristics we've evolved, which set us - but every other life form as well - apart from all the others. There is no overriding purpose to our being special, according to evolutionary theory. We're merely a product of differential reproductive success.
I believe that, in the basis, it is the issue of needing to be special in combination with the need for some overriding purpose that causes fundamentalists to reject evolutionary theory as an explanation for the diversity of life. See the answer below for an example of this.
Answer:
Fundamentalism, and religion in general, is at odds with evolutionary theory because evolutionary theory tends to be taught with the implicit message that God is not part (or need not be part) of the picture, that people do not have souls, and that there's no life after this one.
How were humans created scientifically?
Science provides compelling evidence, through DNA and the fossil record, that humans evolved. Our earliest hominid ancestors diverged from the ancestor of chimpanzees around seven million years ago, and modern humans, Homo sapiens evolved around 250,000 years ago.
For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
What is an example of creationism?
Creationism is the belief that humanity, life, and the Earth were created by a supreme being, typically based on a religious text such as the Bible. For example, some creationists believe in the literal interpretation of the Genesis account in the Bible, which states that God created the world in six days.
What do scientists say on creationism?
Scientists have virtually nothing to say on the topic creationism because the assertions that creationists make are often unfalsifiable and cannot be verified. However, some scientists have made note of where creationism conflicts with known evidence or reasoned logic. Kenneth R. Miller of Brown University, for example, falsified creationist Michael Behe's assertion of irreducible complexity by drawing the analogy of a cell structure to a mouse trap and then demonstrating a plausible precursory function for each one of the mouse trap's components. Miller went a step further and demonstrated precursory functions for each of the components of the bacterial flagellum, which previously Dr. Behe had argued was irreducibly complex.
Why do creationists dislike evolution so much?
1) Because the paradigm in which Evolution is usually taught, is one of atheism. 2) Perhaps they have read about certain highly-qualified scientists who do not believe in Evolution.
3) Maybe they don't appreciate what they see as a lack of objectivity. Presenting putative evidence for Creation has been made illegal in classrooms and public-school textbooks.
4) It could be that those who dislike Evolution are simply unconvinced by it.
How are you different from the rest of creation?
As a digital assistant, I am programmed to provide information and assistance based on algorithms and data processing. I lack consciousness, emotions, and physical form, unlike the rest of creation which consists of living beings with individual experiences and consciousness.
