Drifting

A weakness in Wegener's continental drift hypothesis was the lack of a mechanism explaining how the continents moved. Additionally, he was unable to provide evidence supporting the force that would be strong enough to move continents across the Earth's surface. Lastly, Wegener's theory faced skepticism from the scientific community at the time due to a lack of detailed data and observations supporting his idea of continental drift.

Two forms of evidence used to support continental drift are fossil evidence, where similar plant and animal fossils are found on different continents that were once connected, and geological evidence, such as matching rock formations and mountain ranges across separate continents. These pieces of evidence provide support for the idea that continents were once joined together and have since drifted apart.

Two forms of evidence used to support the continental drift theory are the fit of the continents (jigsaw-like arrangement of continents' coastlines) and matching geological formations (similar rock types, structures, and mountain ranges on different continents). Additionally, paleontological evidence, such as similar fossil records found across separate continents, also supports the theory.

Continental drift plays a role in erosion by influencing the distribution of landmasses and the formation of topographic features. As continents move, they can create new mountain ranges, change the direction of river flow, and alter the patterns of erosion and sediment transport. These changes in topography can impact erosion rates and shape landscapes over long periods of time.

Genetic drift occurs when there are random fluctuations in the gene frequencies of a population due to chance events, such as natural disasters or small population sizes. It is more likely to happen in smaller populations where chance plays a larger role in determining which individuals contribute genes to the next generation.

Fossils found on separate continents that were once connected suggest that landmasses have moved over time. Identical or closely related species of plants and animals found on different continents indicate that they were once part of the same landmass and have since drifted apart. This evidence supports the theory of continental drift proposed by Alfred Wegener.

he used fossils, glacial indentations, and different types of rock.

Rock clues such as similar rock formations and fossils found on different continents supported the hypothesis of continental drift by indicating that the continents were once connected. Matching patterns of mountain ranges and geological structures between continents further supported the idea of continental drift and the existence of a supercontinent in the past. Also, the presence of glacial deposits in regions that are now separated by oceans provided evidence of past climatic conditions and continental movement.

While Wegner's theory of continental drift assumed that continents plowed through and over oceanic crust, his basic ideas are still upheld today. As a result of submarines and radar technology used in WWII, scientists were better able to map the seafloor. In doing so they discovered the seafloor's topography, age, magnetism, and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. After discovering that the seafloor did spread apart and that continents moved, Wegner's theory gradually became accepted.

Genetic drift is the random change in gene frequencies within a population due to chance events. It can lead to the loss of genetic diversity and the fixation of certain alleles in a population. Genetic drift is more likely to occur in small populations or isolated populations.

The continental drift theory was strengthened by several discoveries of similar species on widely separated continents. The basic idea was that if Continent A, say, Africa, had a fossil of a certain worm on its west coast, while Continent B, South America, had a fossil of the same worm on its eastern coast, it would only make sense that at one time these continents had to be joined to allow for this species to flourish in both areas at once. The only other possible explanation would be that the worms swam across the ocean...which isn't exactly feasible considering that they are, in fact, worms.

While geological research during the sixties had shed new light into the theory, it was J. Tuzo Wilson's proposal of a mechanism for continental drift what led to widespread acceptance of the theory. Proposing a feasible mechanism was something Wegener himself had failed to do, he had only proposed some evidence (complementary coastlines and fossil distributions across continents.) and falsified mechanisms (like Earth's centrifugal pseudoforce).

The primary force that causes continents to drift is believed to be plate tectonics. This theory suggests that the Earth's outer shell, or lithosphere, is divided into several large plates that float on the semi-fluid asthenosphere below. The movement of these plates is driven by processes such as mantle convection and the force generated at mid-ocean ridges.

with a small population size because random fluctuations in allele frequencies can have a larger impact on the overall genetic composition of the population. This can lead to the fixation of certain alleles or loss of others purely due to chance.

The mechanism by which continents spread apart is known as plate tectonics. This theory proposes that the Earth's outer shell is divided into plates that move relative to each other, causing continents to drift apart over geologic time. The driving force behind this movement is believed to be the process of mantle convection, where heat from Earth's interior causes currents in the mantle that move the plates.

Yes. Genetic drift-- the change in allelic frequencies of a population due to chance-- can play a major role in evolution. The effects of drift are most pronounced in small, isolated populations. Drift can bring alleles to fixation very quickly in such populations, and can lead to genetic differentiation between them, possibly contributing to speciation.

The theory that states continents can drift apart from each other is called plate tectonics. It explains how the Earth's lithosphere is divided into large plates that move and interact with each other, leading to processes like continental drift and the formation of mountains, earthquakes, and volcanoes. This theory is supported by evidence such as the matching coastlines of continents, the distribution of fossils, and the presence of deep ocean trenches.

The first instances of scientists discovering continental drift was primarily by first studying a world map of the continents. This was suggested as early as 1596 by the Dutch map maker Abraham Ortelius in the third edition of his work Thesaurus Geographicus. Ortelius suggested that the Americas, Eurasia and Africa were once joined and have since drifted apart "by earthquakes and floods," creating the modern Atlantic Ocean. For his evidence, he wrote: "The vestiges of the rupture reveal themselves, if someone brings forward a map of the world and considers carefully the coasts of the three continents." Francis Bacon commented on Ortelius' idea in 1620, as did Benjamin Franklin and Alexander von Humboldt in later centuries.

In 1912, Alfred Wegener found 4 types of evidence that supported his theory. First he found that the types of rocks on different coasts where similar to each other; the second was the mountain ranges not only on land but also under the ocean, the third was the noted similarities of fossils found on each continent, and lastly ware the findings of fossils and geologically ancient rocks on Antarctica.

Seafloor spreading occurs at mid-ocean ridges where new oceanic crust is formed and spreads away from the ridge. This process provides evidence for continental drift as it shows that the oceanic crust is younger near the ridges and gets progressively older farther away. This supports the idea that continents were once connected and have since moved apart.

Alfred Wegener's continental drift theory has subsequently been honed by scientific discoveries to the more all-inclusive plate tectonic theory which is generally accepted by earth scientists.

Yes and no. His hypothesis about how the plates were moved eventually was proven wrong, although his hypothesis that the plates had shifted in position over time was proven. The physical evidence in support of continental drift (now referred to as the theory of plate tectonics) began to be considered overwhelming back in the 1960s, with the discovery of the mid-ocean ridges and the accompanying paleomagnetic striping along the sea floor which has recorded magnetic reversals in newly formed crustal rock. More recently, we have measured the rates of motion of each of the continental plates using GPS satellite technology. The fact the plates drift is now indisputable.

Continental drift is the theory that Earth's continents were once all connected as a single supercontinent called Pangaea and have since drifted apart to their current positions over millions of years. This movement is driven by the slow shifting of tectonic plates that make up Earth's crust.

Plate tectonics (from the Late Latin tectonicus, from the Greek: τεκτονικός "pertaining to building")[1] is a scientific theory that describes the large-scale motions of Earth's lithosphere. The theory builds on the concepts of continental drift, developed during the first decades of the 20th century. It was accepted by the geoscientific community after the concepts of seafloor spreading were developed in the late 1950s and early 1960s.Tectonic plates are composed of oceanic lithosphere and thicker continental lithosphere, each topped by its own kind of crust. Along convergent boundaries, subduction carries plates into the mantle; the material lost is roughly balanced by the formation of new (oceanic) crust along divergent margins by seafloor spreading. In this way, the total surface of the globe remains the same. This prediction of plate tectonics is also referred to as the conveyor belt principle. Earlier theories (that still have some supporters) proposed gradual shrinking (contraction) or gradual expansion of the globe.

At the time Alfred Wegener proposed the theory of continental drift in the early 20th century, there was insufficient evidence to support it. The mechanism of plate tectonics, which explains how continents move, was not understood until later. Additionally, Wegener faced resistance from scientists of his time due to the lack of a plausible mechanism that could explain how continents could drift.