The introduction of dogs is not a major reason for the extinction of the Thylacine. When a bounty was placed on the Thylacine for fear it might be a sheep-killer and a danger to other livestock, men would have taken their dogs with them to help hunt down the Thylacine. Without the aid of dogs, it is unlikely this elusive creature would have been found by the Europeans, who were (and are) clumsy hunters when it comes to Australian native wildlife.
There is no dog which is native to Tasmania. The question may arise from confusion over the Thylacine, commonly referred to also as either the Tasmanian tiger or even the Tasmanian wolf. The Thylacine, now extinct, was a marsupial. It was neither a tiger nor a wolf. The only dogs in Tasmania are domesticated dogs, or wild dogs (including foxes) resulting from the introduction of dogs to the island. Not even the dingo can be found in Tasmania.
No one intended to cause the extinction of the dodo. The introduction of dogs and pigs to the island resulted in the accidental extinction of the dodo, which could not adequately defend against the new predators.
The Thylacine was hunted to extinction after a bounty was placed on it, as farmers were concerned about the loss of their livestock. Scientists have also recently proven that, prior to its extinction, the Thylacine had limited genetic diversity. There is every chance that, were Thylacines still in existence today, they would most likely be facing similar problems currently faced by the Tasmanian devil. Incidentally, Thylacines are truly extinct. Not a single reported sighting has ever been confirmed.
tigers are cats and dogs are not cats and they hunt differently
through formal introduction?
Since the Thylacine, also known as the Tasmanian tiger, became extinct, the Tasmanian devil has had no other native competitors. However, since the fairly recent introduction of the fox, the fox has become a rival.
This is not known. The Tasmanian tiger, more properly known as the Thylacine, is believed to be extinct. Its hard to investigate the terrain of Tasmania because most of it is thick bushland or cool-temperate rainforest (but not jungle). The Thylacine is believed to have been intelligent, as its head was large in proportion to its body size. Also, people did raise these animals as pets, like domesticated dogs, in the early twentieth century, and these animals were easily trained, very responsive, and similar in behaviour to dogs, despite not being related to the canine family in any way. Thylacines showed more intelligence than other marsupials such as kangaroos. It is interesting to note that if one has not been sighted since the last recorded Thylacine died in 1936, it could either be intelligent by having learnt to avoid humans totally, as they were the direct cause of its extinction.
Neither. The Tasmanian tiger (actually the thylacine) was a marsupial; that puts it in whole separate subclass from dogs and cats, which are placentals. The thylacine occupied the ecological niche which is filled in other places by placental predators. All of the animals mentioned are mammals, but that's about as closely as they're related.
The Tasmanian wolf (or Tasmanian tiger - due to the stripes on its rear) would love to be able to raise their young. Unfortunately, the species is extinct, so would now not be given the opportunity to do so!They became extinct in the 1930s. While Intensive hunting encouraged by bounties is generally blamed for its extinction, disease, the introduction of dogs, and human encroachment into its habitat also led to its extinction.
The Tasmanian tiger, or Thylacine, lived in dry eucalyptus bushland of Tasmania, wetlands and grassland. Fossil evidence suggests that it may once have been widespread throughout the Australian mainland, and even the island of New Guinea, but no records exist to suggest its preferred habitat in those regions.
I don't think so. Buuut I could be wrong! lol
The reason dogs have tails is for balance