no not at all
it depends on how you use it.
Not much, that I am aware of. Mainly, they caused them a lot of harm.
Marie Curie did NOT harm society, she only helped it.
I believe that that is a matter of opinion.
Most likely because the harm caused by drinking is not just to the drinker, it can cause harm to others, to society. Drinking impairs the mind and can cause the drinker to make many other mistakes - drunk driving accidents, anger issues, and the list continues.However, eating pork causes harm only to the person who eats it, not others in society.
The five goals of corrections are retribution (punishment for the crime committed), deterrence (preventing future crimes), incapacitation (removing offenders from society), rehabilitation (helping offenders reintegrate into society), and restoration (repairing harm caused by the crime).
yes society it greatly affected by what you see on the internet, things people show can really do harm to others on the internet
While ICT has brought about many benefits in terms of improving communication, efficiency, and access to information, it has also raised concerns such as data privacy, security threats, and digital divide. It's essential to address these challenges to ensure that ICT continues to have a positive impact on society.
Nothing. Both are drugs. Differences are on "perceived" harm to society, not the individual. Nothing. Both are drugs. Differences are on "perceived" harm to society, not the individual. Nothing. Both are drugs. Differences are on "perceived" harm to society, not the individual.
Strict liability holds a person or entity responsible for harm caused regardless of fault, while negligence requires proving that the harm was caused by a failure to exercise reasonable care.
Prohibition was repealed because about 75% of U.S. voters came to believe that it caused much more harm than any good.
Because it could not adopt the same features as the other person. It isn't good for health. And it can harm the person and society. :)