(*Wiki s are provided subject to the Site Disclaimer at the related link below.)
Objective assessment of independently verified facts, concensus, and consistency. On the internet, it is generally good advice to be wary of uncited information.
____
The dilemma you present is inherent to all topics found on the internet. All you or anyone can do is find a site that is well regulated, & to check your answers with other sources.
______
You can't be certain how valid an answer is on a site like this where everyone is encouraged to provide answers.
It never hurts to do a little research on your own once you get an answer and see if the facts match up.
It also helps if people would mention where they got their facts.
And (this should be obvious) if a reply starts with something like "I'm not sure, but..." or "I think..."
And thanks to many helpful, responsible and knowledgeable people, incorrect information is often noticed and commented on.
_____
Please bear in mind, too, that some questions relate to very complex issues and no single answer will be right in an 'absolute' sense. Obviously, a question like 'What were the underlying causes of WW1?' isn't comparable to 'How many yards are there in a mile?' The question about WW1 is still a matter of scholarly research and debate, whereas the question about yards in a mile is quite different. (Having said that, some answers will certainly be inaccurate). With experience, you may be able to work out whether an answer is well informed - whether the person who wrote it seems to have done plenty of reading on the topic or not. You may be able to develop a the ability to recognize answers that are a repetition of what the answerer learned at high school, and may now remember inaccurately. Some answers may be based on guesswork, and you may be able to learn to recognize these.
In general, one should be cautious about accepting a simple answer to a question about things that are complicated.
If you need to be reasonably certain about the accuracy of an answer, you should do the necessary research in the ordinary way, and treat the answer(s) you get here as possibilities, not as definitive.
---
If an answer is wrong, we hope someone with the right answer will fix it. You can report errors to the category supervisors.
Although an answer may not satisfy your question, in many cases it may indicate terms or corrections that will help locate your information.
Wikipedia can be credible if the editor cited beyond the page but if the information is not cited the information may or may not be correct.
Usually Is CorrectActually, the information on Wikipedia is usually correct. When users are allowed to add and edit content, there is always a chance that the article could contain wrong information or vandalism, but Wikipedia has trusted members who watch for that to remove and/or correct it.
no, it is not because sometimes it doesn't give you correct information i wouldn't always trust wikipedia
I don't know;lets see on wikipedia.
Wikipedia is a good place to START looking for information. It can give you the basics, but you need to remember that it's not a real encyclopedia - anybody can write in Wikipedia and the information might not be correct. Always check your information with another source or two.
Yes, it is correct to say "Did you know about this information?" as a question inquiring if someone is aware of a particular piece of information.
WikiPedia allows anyone to post information, so certainly there are mistakes. It's a good place to start, but always do more research to make sure the information is correct.
Well, you could always just use wikipedia instead of this dumb cite.
On Wikipedia, you can find information about autotune, a software used to correct pitch in music recordings. The article covers its history, how it works, its impact on the music industry, controversies, and notable users.
Information about Monon Railroad / Trail can be found on their Wikipedia pages respectively. However, not all of the information found on Wikipedia is factually correct, therefore it may be a good idea to check the official website - Monon instead.
Information about Chasey Lane can be found on her Wikipedia page. Some of this information may not be factually correct, as it can be edited by ordinary people.
There are professors who will not accept information obtained through Wikipedia. You should always ask. However, this does not mean there is not valuable information through Wikipedia. You can always read the Wikipedia documentation and look at the references given. Then you can go to those references and to retrieve information that is acceptable. Still, I have found very good information on Wikipedia, which added to issue at hand. You just cannot cite Wikipedia if the professor does not allow the information obtained from the site.