No it is not. It is run by the left wing tree hugging wing of the democratic party.
Snopes aims to provide accurate and unbiased fact-checking without political bias. They focus on verifying the accuracy of claims regardless of the political affiliations involved. However, like any source, it's important for readers to critically evaluate information for themselves.
Snopes [dot] com
Snopes is pronounced as "snohps." The "o" in Snopes is pronounced like the "o" in "no."
Snopes is pronounced as "snoh-ps".
I have finally come to the conclusion that snopes is not impartial, factual, neutral or unbiased where Oback Obama is concerned. I have really tried to be neutral myself but have to face the fact that I have never read even potentially critical response of any of snopes responses to the accusations or questions about Obama's viewpoints, behaviors, or background. No matter how much Obama might be admired by someone, he is not a perfect person any more than I - or you are.
no
Snopes seeks to legitimatize or disprove rumors. It can not be categorized as partisan.
Yes, the Singapore principal letter is debunked by Snopes.
Yes, the monkey ladder experiment is not debunked by Snopes.
Yes, the story of Ross Capicchioni is verified by Snopes.
Not an app, but the Snopes site can be bookmarked on your browser and accessed via Wi-Fi.
Yes, the story of the Ourang Medan has been debunked by Snopes.