How has FDI increased since the 1980s?

Which of the following was not true about televisión since the 1980s?

increased government control of channel selections. (apex)

Is there any difference between fdi and direct investment?

If the direct investment is foreign, then no, since FDI stands for 'foreign direct investment'.

Why has HRM increased in importance since the 1980s?

HRM has increased in importance since 1980's why?becauseglobalizationgovernment regulationstronger knowledge/research basechanging role for labourchallenge of matching worker expectations with competitive demandsby naveen mudda

What is the FDI of China?

The FDI of China has increased by a large amount over the last decade. It reached $59.1 billion in the first six months of 2012 and hit $64.1 billion in 2013.

What was not true about television since 1980s?

the government has increasingly controlled how many stations are available -apex

Was not true about television since the 1980s?

Increased government control of channel selections The major news networks grew to be stronger than ever

When was FDi magazine created?

FDi magazine was created in 2001.

For the most part the writers and who have stayed unchanged since the 1980s?

the writers and producers of the show have stayed unchanged since the 1980s on The Young and Restless

What is the fullform of FDI?

The Full Form of FDI isForeign direct investment

What do the initial FDI refer to?

The initials FDI often refer to the Foreign Direct Investment. It could also stand for the British FDi magazine, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the FDI World Dental Federation.

What was the capital of Sweden in the 1980s?

Stockholm was the capital of Sweden throughout the 1980s, as it has been since the year 1634.

Horizontal foreign direct Investment?

This paper examines the impact of uncertainty on the profitability of vertical and horizontal foreign direct investment (FDI). Vertical FDI takes place when the multinational fragments the production process internationally, locating each stage of production in the country where it can be done at the least cost. Horizontal FDI occurs when the multinational undertakes the same production activities in multiple countries. We consider a model where the risk-neutral multinational must commit its investment prior to the realization of shocks. The multinational has monopoly power and confronts two types of risk. It may face random productivity shocks or encounter a host country that tries to confiscate its rents. We show that greater uncertainty reduces the expected income from vertical FDI but increases the expected income from horizontal FDI. In addition, predatory actions by the host country are more costly to the multinational that has structured its production vertically rather than horizontally. Consequently, increased uncertainty should encourage horizontal FDI but discourage vertical FDI. If vertical FDI is more likely to flow into emerging markets and horizontal FDI into mature markets, then the empirical finding that most FDI is horizontal rather than vertical might be due, in part, to the greater uncertainty associated with emerging markets. We report cross-country regression results that provide some support for the predictions of the model. Volatility appears to have a differential impact on FDI inflows into mature and emerging markets. For mature markets that supposedly attract mainly horizontal FDI, greater volatility significantly increases FDI inflows. For emerging markets that receive relatively more vertical FDI inflows, increased volatility does not increase FDI inflows. copyright http://www.nber.org/papers/w8631