To correct an error on Wikipedia, a user can edit the relevant article directly, provided they have an account or are willing to edit anonymously. They should ensure that their corrections are based on reliable sources and follow Wikipedia's guidelines for citations. After making the changes, the edit can be summarized, and the user can save the modifications. Other editors may review the changes, and if necessary, further discussions can occur on the article's talk page.
other sites have picked up your flawed biographies and repeated that error so tell me how canwe corect them
The only location for Iverson Ranch was in Chatsworth; the citation in Wikipedia placing it partly in Victorville is in error. The page has been corrected.
The difference between the corrected reading and the mean (average) reading is called 'Absolute error.
It is possible that the error was not corrected due to oversight, lack of awareness of the mistake, or not enough emphasis placed on the importance of correcting it. It's important to communicate clearly and directly about the error to ensure it is addressed promptly.
No
That all depends on the error. You can add more details on the discussion page.
elctronic health record how should an error be corrected on a patient
As long as the error is corrected with a scriveners amendment and recorded, then the deed stands as intended.
Linux seems to have corrected my issues
You would use a caret (^) inserted above or below the error to indicate it needs to be corrected.
It means you were wrong about something and are explaining this fact to someone, such as: "When I said it was going to rain today, I stand corrected, it is actually sunny out."
simply speaking, systematic errors are those you can improve on( so if you have a systematic error, its probably your fault). Random errors are unpredictable and cannot be corrected. A parallax error can be corrected by you and if there is a parallax error, its probably your fault.