No. Anyone can submit an entry at Wikipedia but only published works and people that are qualified can make their way into Britannica, or Encarta, or Columbia, or any other encyclopedia for that matter.
Wikipedia has been shown to be a reliable source of information that is constantly up to date and where it is possible to bring corrections to articles where needed. I think you can rely on the information there.
Yes, Scientific American is generally considered a reliable source for scientific information due to its rigorous editorial process and reputation for publishing accurate and credible research.
The internet is not the most reliable but sometimes the only source, as some information can only be found there.
textbook apexC: V.H.<3
Not necessarily, articles on Wikipedia are edited by other users and the information they put may not be from a reliable source, or sometimes it may not be from a source at all. So, Wikipedia isn't your most reliable source because they answers they have may not be right all the time.
Not necessarily, articles on Wikipedia are edited by other users and the information they put may not be from a reliable source, or sometimes it may not be from a source at all. So, Wikipedia isn't your most reliable source because they answers they have may not be right all the time.
I find that Wikipedia is a very good source for information although I stillcheckand verify other sources but over all I find it very reliable!
For information about pocket hand warmers, Wikipedia is one of many reliable online source. Wikipedia archives accurate and detailed information, that one can use for references.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source because the information which is provided, is written by people who post their own information (which is not always correct), although the information is moderated and checked, some of it may not always be completely truthful. I do recommend Wikipedia as a source, but just make sure to double check anything you're unsure of.
People say that Wikipedia is an unreliable source because anyone can change what it says, however, if moderators catch someone making a stupid edit, they will return the text to it's original so Wikipedia is a reliable source.
No, ezinearticles.com is not considered a reliable source of information. It is an article directory where anyone can publish content, so the quality and accuracy of the information can vary widely. It is often better to rely on more reputable sources for accurate and trustworthy information.
Reliable information on elands can be found on encyclopedic websites although Wikipedia would not be recommended. Reputable science websites such as science direct would be another source.