Whether WikiLeaks should be held accountable is a contentious issue. Proponents argue that transparency and the public's right to know are paramount, while critics contend that the indiscriminate release of classified information can endanger lives and national security. Ultimately, accountability may hinge on balancing the ethical implications of leaking information against the potential harm it can cause. The debate often reflects broader questions about freedom of speech, governmental transparency, and the responsibilities of journalists and activists.
They should and are.
yes, I believe that business should be held accountable for there action while conduct business.
The security officer or Administrator
The Federal Government.
The hacker.
Yes, individuals should be held accountable for providing aid and comfort to the enemy during times of conflict as it can endanger the safety and security of their own country and its citizens.
He needs to be out of jail so that he may support his child and to be held accountable
no Actually people with dementia can be held accountable. This does not mean all dementia suffers can or will be held accountable. Some have a very mild form and have a reasonable understanding of right and wrong, and some have severe dementia and probably would not even be able to recall such an incident seconds later. Should they be treated in the same manner.
Congress should be held accountable for their actions, no matter what. They are responsible for legislating the laws that affect our daily lives, and should be held to a higher standard than the public.
Please explain what you mean.
Held responsible
Only for direct subordinates at most, such as the vice-president and cabinet secretaries.