Because it would get to more of the truth.
During a trial, lawyers commonly ask witnesses questions about what they saw, heard, or experienced related to the case. They may ask about specific details, events, timelines, and the witness's personal knowledge or involvement. Lawyers also ask witnesses to clarify their statements, provide context, and support their testimony with evidence or documentation.
If you are in a murder trial, you would probably ask like where they were on the night of the murder, did you see anyone else commit the murder, things like that.
You should defend the small claim if you are right. If you are wrong, it is to your advantage to contact the plaintiff prior to trial to work out a payment plan--this is perfectly acceptable and even encouraged by the courts. If the plaintiff will not work with you, at trial, you should ask the judge to set a payment plan.
some questions to ask about aurora are what is the reason for aurora
Definitely. The point is to bring out the truth. If questioning is necessary (and it is), then so be it.
Judges in court during a trial typically ask questions to clarify evidence, assess witness credibility, and ensure fair proceedings. They may inquire about the facts of the case, legal arguments, and the relevance of testimony.
Pleadings like the complaint and the answer are not evidence. The standard practice is to conduct what is called discovery. You can ask written questions about the facts to support the allegations of the complaint, demand documents and take the depositions of the witnesses. The plaintiff is not necessarily obligated to proceed at trial with all of the claims, but you can have the witnesses and documentary evidence available at trial to disprove the claims.
Pleadings like the complaint and the answer are not evidence. The standard practice is to conduct what is called discovery. You can ask written questions about the facts to support the allegations of the complaint, demand documents and take the depositions of the witnesses. The plaintiff is not necessarily obligated to proceed at trial with all of the claims, but you can have the witnesses and documentary evidence available at trial to disprove the claims.
No. A defendant cannot ask for pre-trial access to the prosecution's questions. The unrehearsed nature of the defendant's answers to the prosecutor's questions reveal more of the truth than a planned performance would.
Prosecutors typically ask witnesses questions to establish facts, clarify details, and challenge the defense's case. These questions can be open-ended, leading, or cross-examination questions aimed at proving the defendant's guilt.
some good questions would be to ask are what was the material made out of