During a trial, I might ask the plaintiff questions such as: "Can you describe the events that led to your injury?" This helps establish the context and details of the case. I would also inquire, "What impact has this incident had on your daily life?" to assess damages. Finally, I might ask, "Have you sought medical treatment, and what has that involved?" to understand the extent of injuries and recovery efforts.
Because it would get to more of the truth.
In a murder trial, some important questions to ask might include: What evidence links the defendant to the crime scene? Are there any eyewitnesses, and what are their accounts of the events? What is the motive behind the alleged crime, and how does it align with the evidence presented? Additionally, what is the reliability of the forensic evidence, and were proper procedures followed during the investigation?
During a trial, lawyers commonly ask witnesses questions about what they saw, heard, or experienced related to the case. They may ask about specific details, events, timelines, and the witness's personal knowledge or involvement. Lawyers also ask witnesses to clarify their statements, provide context, and support their testimony with evidence or documentation.
You should defend the small claim if you are right. If you are wrong, it is to your advantage to contact the plaintiff prior to trial to work out a payment plan--this is perfectly acceptable and even encouraged by the courts. If the plaintiff will not work with you, at trial, you should ask the judge to set a payment plan.
If you are in a murder trial, you would probably ask like where they were on the night of the murder, did you see anyone else commit the murder, things like that.
some questions to ask about aurora are what is the reason for aurora
Definitely. The point is to bring out the truth. If questioning is necessary (and it is), then so be it.
Judges in court during a trial typically ask questions to clarify evidence, assess witness credibility, and ensure fair proceedings. They may inquire about the facts of the case, legal arguments, and the relevance of testimony.
Pleadings like the complaint and the answer are not evidence. The standard practice is to conduct what is called discovery. You can ask written questions about the facts to support the allegations of the complaint, demand documents and take the depositions of the witnesses. The plaintiff is not necessarily obligated to proceed at trial with all of the claims, but you can have the witnesses and documentary evidence available at trial to disprove the claims.
Pleadings like the complaint and the answer are not evidence. The standard practice is to conduct what is called discovery. You can ask written questions about the facts to support the allegations of the complaint, demand documents and take the depositions of the witnesses. The plaintiff is not necessarily obligated to proceed at trial with all of the claims, but you can have the witnesses and documentary evidence available at trial to disprove the claims.
In a mock trial featuring Davy Crockett, consider asking questions that delve into his motivations and actions. You might ask, "What inspired you to join the fight at the Alamo, and how did you perceive your role there?" Additionally, inquire about his views on frontier justice by asking, "How did your experiences as a congressman influence your beliefs about law and order?" Lastly, ask, "What do you believe your legacy should be, and how do you want to be remembered by future generations?" These questions can help explore his character and contributions.
No. A defendant cannot ask for pre-trial access to the prosecution's questions. The unrehearsed nature of the defendant's answers to the prosecutor's questions reveal more of the truth than a planned performance would.