It's unfair that a few men got to choose for millions of people. Moreover, these millions of people disagreed with their decision.
Maybe
Tiered service
Obama has not mad eany formal statements about Net Neutrality, but a positive step has been taken with the announcement of a pro-neutrality pick as the chairman of the FCC, the ultimate decider other then congress
it urged the repeal of all the neutrality laws and wanted stronger action against Germany
it urged the repeal of all the neutrality laws and wanted stronger action against Germany
how do search engines work
The basic concept of net neutrality is a network design principle that aspires to treat all content, sites, and platforms equally when they are considered to be very publicly useful.
Net neutrality preserves internet integrity for users. It helps to prevent restrictions on content, sites and platforms. It also works to prevent restrictions on types of equipment that may be attached and different modes of communication.
Net neutrality allows all websites to share the burden equally when internet traffic becomes to heavy, in theory. The bill states that companies can shift the burden to website deemed less important in cases of "extraordinary congestion". However, "extraordinary congestion" is a meaningless term as it does not quantify how much congestion is "extraordinary congestion". In short, the limits of net neutrality are subject to change at the whims of whoever is in charge.
I think you might mean Net Neutrality, though I might be wrong. Net Neutrality is a proposal that Internet Service Providers be prohibited from blocking certain websites (or slowing them down). For instance, it would prevent Comcast from blocking Qwest's website.
In regards to net neutrality, Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft seem to have the most control as of now. The debate has been ongoing since 2005 when the FCC issued a Broadband Policy Statement concerning the four principles of open internet.
Arguments for net neutrality include the idea that all internet traffic should be treated equally, preventing discrimination by internet service providers. This ensures fair access to information and promotes innovation. Arguments against net neutrality suggest that regulations could stifle investment in internet infrastructure and limit the ability of ISPs to manage their networks efficiently. Some believe that market competition and consumer choice should dictate how the internet operates, rather than government intervention.