You will need to expand on that question. If you mean how many stars are born in a galaxy then it would be inaccurate for me to give an answer because a galaxy is a vast, heavy grouping of stars, supported by gravity. There is no minimum or maximum amount of stars allowed and so a galaxy could vary quite vastly in the number of stars it contains.
A large number of stars with a perceptible structure such as a galaxy would be called a star system.
Astronomer's have not been able to count all the planets in the Andromeda Galaxy. The Andromeda Galaxy is home to one-trillion stars. The Andromeda Galaxy is expected to collide with the Milky Way in the next 4.5-billion years.
I guess that would refer to a star that is part of a galaxy. That would apply to the vast majority of stars.
It is less likely for stars in the halo of a galaxy to have planets compared to stars in the disk of the galaxy. This is because the halo contains older stars with fewer heavy elements necessary for planet formation. However, some planets could still exist around halo stars, but they would be rare.
If you counted 1 number per second, it would take nearly 13,000 years to count all 400 billion stars in the Star Wars galaxy.
yes a galaxy can dieone way a galaxy can die if another galaxy collides with a smaller galaxy even though the result is a larger galaxy the smaller galaxy died because it no longer exzitesa galaxy is a huge cluster of stars. even though in a Large Galaxy such as a spiral with enough gas to form new stars, when a star dies out, the energy collides with the gas to form new stars.But in a galaxy that is small and dim such as eliptical galaxies with dim low solar mass stars it would not have enough energy to form a new stars because the gas is far apart and not enough to form new stars. so if all of the stars die out there would be no new stars get formed all that would be left are dense cores called white dwarfs,black holes and neutron stars and some dust. there would almost be no light generated by the galaxy.but not all galaxies die out(FOUND OUT FROM AN ASTROMNER)
Many estimates in astronomy have some uncertainty to them, and the estimate of the number of stars in our galaxy is no exception. Even the world's largest telescopes can't count the stars. They see only the brightest and nearest stars - and stars not obscured by dust. To estimate the number of the Milky Way's stars, astronomers first assume there's nothing special about our region of space. They determine the number of different types stars in this region - then extend this knowledge to the galaxy as a whole. The most popular current models suggest the Milky Way is about 100,000 light-years across. The estimate for the number of stars is about 100 billion stars - plus or minus 50 billion.
All stars we currently know of are part of a galaxy. Stars are born within galaxies from clouds of gas and dust. If a star were to exist without belonging to a galaxy, it would likely be a result of very rare and extreme circumstances, such as being ejected from its parent galaxy due to a collision or interaction with another galaxy.
Yes it would. Our galaxy is a spiral and fairly flat. When we look around our own galaxy, some parts of the sky are only thinly populated with stars but there is a line of dense stars called the milky way which is looking through the flat disk of our galaxy. An eliptical galaxy is different. It is not a flat disk but more like a ball or an egg. If we lived near the centre, no matter which way we looked, the number of stars would be about the same. If we lived on the edge of the galaxy, one side of the night sky would be filled with stars and the other side would have very few to almost none.
The word galaxy is a noun used to describe a cluster of billions of stars. One way to use the word in a sentence would be to say, "The Milky Way is the galaxy of stars that we live in."
We have no idea. Since the Triangulum galaxy is quite distant, we certainly cannot see any individual planets; we cannot even see individual STARS at that distance unless they are quite bright. We can GUESS; for the nearby stars that we have studied using the Kepler Space Telescope, we seem to be averaging about one planet per star. The Triangulum Galaxy, M33, is somewhat smaller than the Milky Way or the Andromeda Galaxy, and Wikipedia estimates it at perhaps 40 billion stars, and estimate that is probably quite low. (We are discovering that there are far more of the small dim stars around than we had expected.) So a reasonable first approximation for the number of planets present there would probably be somewhere on the order of 100 billion. But that's a GUESS.