answersLogoWhite

0

Great question! The difference in how Google and Microsoft distribute their operating systems (OS) comes down to business models, target markets, and product ecosystems.

Here’s a breakdown:

🟦 1. Different Business Models:

Microsoft (Windows): Traditionally sells licenses for its OS to users and manufacturers (OEMs). It used to distribute Windows on physical media like DVDs.

Google (Android and Chrome OS): Offers its OS for free, especially Android, to phone manufacturers. Google earns revenue indirectly through ads, app sales, and search data.

🟩 2. Type of Operating Systems:

Windows is a general-purpose OS meant for desktops and laptops.

Android is for mobile devices, and Chrome OS is cloud-based for lightweight laptops (Chromebooks). These are not typically installed by end-users themselves like Windows.

🟨 3. Open Source Approach:

Android is based on the open-source AOSP (Android Open Source Project). Manufacturers customize it and ship it with their phones.

Google doesn’t need to sell it in DVD form — it’s built to be pre-installed and updated over the air (OTA).

🟧 4. User Experience Expectations:

Google wants users to have a ready-to-use experience. Most Android users aren't expected to install the OS themselves.

Windows users historically did install or reinstall the OS, hence the DVD model (though now Microsoft also offers digital downloads or USB installers).

🟥 5. Shift from Physical to Digital:

Even Microsoft doesn’t rely on DVDs anymore — now it uses digital downloads and bootable USBs.

Google never had to shift from physical media because its OS distribution was designed around cloud and OTA updates from the start.

In short:

📀 Microsoft sells Windows as a product.

☁️ Google gives Android/Chrome OS as a platform, and monetizes everything else around it.

If you want to explore how this affects device pricing or market strategy, I’d be happy to dive in deeper!

What else can I help you with?