Globular clusters are vital to our understanding of the universe because they contain some of the oldest stars, offering insights into the formation and evolution of galaxies. Their dense populations of stars allow astronomers to study stellar evolution and dynamics in a controlled environment. Additionally, globular clusters can serve as laboratories for testing theories of dark matter and the early universe, helping to unravel the mysteries of cosmic history.
A globular cluster is a group of thousands of stars. As the density decreases from the centre, all clusters are measured until the luminosity has decreased by one half - a half radii. So, most globular clusters have a half light radius of around 32 light years.
No, globular clusters are large groups of stars that formed together at the same time. They are much larger and contain thousands to millions of stars, unlike small asteroids, and were not the building blocks of planets.
I can't say yes, and I can't say no. The reason is because Nebulas can beenormous, it'sridiculous! But clusters are normally bigger than nebulas so on my opinion I'd say no. But if you are on a test or homework and nebula is bigger, then just go with that.
Astronomers believe the globular clusters are made of old stars because of the lack of heavy elements. The heavy element is very abundant in stars like our sun, so the theory is the globular cluster must be older and formed in a more primitive universe.
Open clusters are younger, contain fewer stars, and are less densely packed than globular clusters. Globular clusters are older, have more stars, and are more tightly bound together. Additionally, open clusters are typically found in the disk of a galaxy, while globular clusters are located in the halo.
Oh, I see you're exploring the wonders of the cosmos! Open clusters are like a cozy group of friends, they have fewer stars and tend to be younger and more spread out. Globular clusters, on the other hand, are like a grand family reunion with thousands of stars tightly packed together, and they tend to be much older. Remember, each one is unique and beautiful in its own special way. Keep exploring, friend, and let your curiosity guide you to new discoveries.
Star clusters (or star clouds) are groups of stars.There are two types of star clustersGlobular clusters: are tight groups of hundreds of thousands of very old stars, which are gravitationally bound.Open clusters: are more loosely clustered group of stars, generally contain less than a few hundred members, and are often very young.See related link for more information
The idea is that CERTAIN TYPES of stars, including certain variable stars (such as Cepheids) have a known brightness; so if you observe their apparent brightness, you can calculate their distance.
The Hertzsprung-Russell diagram helps scientists study the properties and evolution of globular clusters by showing the relationship between a star's brightness and temperature. This diagram allows researchers to classify stars in globular clusters based on their stage of evolution and helps them understand how these clusters change over time.
There are two types of star clusters. Globular clusters are tight groups of hundreds of thousands of very old stars which are gravitationally bound, while open clusters, are more loosely clustered, generally containing less than a few hundred stars, and are usually very young.
The visible universe. I'm a bit of a space buff and to my knowledge there aren't any celestial structures that are larger than a galaxy cluster. The only one I've come upon is the visible universe itself. I could be wrong about that but then again, I could be right. That tends to be how celestial questions like that one go. Hope this helps. Answer 2: Galaxy clusters are clusters of galaxies and therefore larger than individual galaxies. Superclusters are clusters of galaxy clusters and so are larger then galaxy clusters. Filaments are collections of superclusters and are the largest known structures in the universe.
It really depends on the type of star, but for certain star types, there is a relationship between the period and the absolute brightness, so if the period is observed, the absolute brightness can be deduced. Yes. It seems like this question is about the Cepheid variables.