Wikipedia is considered a reliable source because each article must undergo a rigorous review process, with many professional reviewers involved. Is the ideal place to start your research and get a global picture of a topic. Is always good check the facts we find in Wikipedia against other sources but Wikipedia is as accurate or more accurate than more traditional encyclopedias.
Answers is a credible website. But for academic writing, it would likely be judged as unacceptable because answers can be edited.
Yes, Elsevier is generally considered a credible source for academic research due to its reputation as a leading publisher of scientific and scholarly journals.
To quote reviews effectively in academic writing, you should select relevant and credible reviews, provide proper attribution to the source, and integrate the quotes smoothly into your own writing to support your arguments or analysis. Be sure to follow the citation style required by your academic institution or publication guidelines.
MDPI is generally considered a credible source for academic research, as it is a reputable publisher with a peer-review process for its articles. However, it is always important to critically evaluate the quality and reliability of individual articles regardless of the source.
You cite a source in academic writing whenever you use information, ideas, or words from that source to support your own work or arguments.
The third person point of view affects the credibility of the sources in academic writing because the person cites another source which is not credible. The third point of view is point is open to distortion.
Yes, a book can be considered an academic source if it is written by a credible author and contains well-researched information that is relevant to the topic being studied.
In academic writing, when citing a source with no author, you can use the title of the source in place of the author's name in the citation. Make sure to include the title in the in-text citation and the reference list.
Yes, Sage Journals is generally considered a credible source for academic research. It is a reputable publisher known for its peer-reviewed scholarly journals across various disciplines. Researchers often rely on Sage Journals for high-quality and reliable information.
"Ibid" should be used in academic writing to refer to a previously cited source when the source is the same as the one cited immediately before it.
I am a Professor of Medicine at Harvard University, and my students have been using Wikipedia for years. It is a very credible and good source. Not to mention but that its a great and a reliable source.
Unlike Yahoo or Google wikipedia does refer to many austonishing questions. In many versions the reality is true but may be deffective of one or two results. . .like "why are clouds white?"