The principles of the declaration - that all men are created equal and have inherent rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness - can be applied to slavery by recognizing that slavery is a violation of these rights. By abolishing slavery and ensuring equal rights and opportunities for all individuals, we uphold the principles of the declaration and promote a more just and equitable society.
Abraham Lincoln disagreed with the Dred Scott decision, which stated that African Americans could not be U.S. citizens. He believed it was morally wrong and went against the principles of the Declaration of Independence. Lincoln saw the decision as further evidence of the need to address the issue of slavery in America.
Back in the days of racism and slavery black people were not viewed as a man. They were often refereed to as a persons item. The Deceleration of Independence only gave freedom to men who were citizens and if you were merely an item then you could not be a citizen.
slavery ended a while ago
Salves could not vote for many years after slavery was abolished.
Northern workers and immigrants opposed slavery for a variety of reasons, including economic competition (as slave labor could reduce job opportunities), moral opposition to the institution of slavery, and a desire to prevent its expansion into new territories to maintain a free labor market. Additionally, some believed that slavery undermined the principles of equality and freedom that the United States was founded upon.
Who signed the Declaration of Independenc?
Copies of the Declaration of Independence were printed and released to the public. The Declaration was read aloud to those who could not read.
Benjamin Franklin - the most respected American of that time - helped frame the Declaration of Independence. He was one of the five members of The Committee to produce a Declaration. (The other members were John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Roger Sherman, and Robert Livingston.) Some scholars believe that Franklin was asked to write the Declaration and that he turned it down. Why? Because his "writing was not to be edited."Franklin was the most outspoken of the anti-slavery delegates and he would have included that clause in the Declaration. Franklin and Adams chose Jefferson to write the Declaration. Besides being an excellent writer, Jefferson was a slave owner from Virginia and this was politically important! If slavery was to be abolished in July of 1776, it would have to be proposed by a Southerner. When Jefferson finished his 1st draft of the Declaration, he immediately took it to Franklin who edited it! The clause of abolishing slavery went to Congress, but the Southern colonies/states would have no part of it and it was deleted from the signed Declaration. Franklin reminded Adams and other Northern anti-slavery delegates that the issue at hand was independence from Britain - not abolishing slavery. The issue of slavery could be brought up later. (And was it ever!) Franklin also gained the support of the French monarchy in the way of French troops and money that was instrumental in the American defeat of the British. How ironic that Franklin's influence of seeking "equal rights for all men" would be the later rallying cry for the French Revolution and the death knell for the French king and queen. - Brad Watson 5/28/09 11:01 MiamiWorldPerc@netzero.com
In his Gettyburg address, he was quoting from the Declaration of Independence. That phrase would be recognizable to the audience , stir patriotic feelings and could be applied to freeing the slaves.
Frederick Douglass argued that the U.S. Constitution was fundamentally an anti-slavery document, as it contained principles of liberty and justice that could be interpreted to support emancipation. He emphasized that the framers’ intent was to create a nation founded on freedom, and he believed that the Constitution's preamble and its clauses could be leveraged to advocate for the rights of enslaved people. Douglass contended that by highlighting the Constitution's moral and ethical foundations, abolitionists could effectively challenge the institution of slavery. Thus, he saw the Constitution as a powerful tool in the fight for emancipation.
Slavery was not something you could half-abolish.
Abolitionists argued that slavery was morally wrong.