hey were are you going to have ur party at can i please come i love you justinbieber i am ur fan i listen to ur song everday i look at urpictures
No, come is not a verb and "going to come" implies future reference while "at" is present tense they contradict, the proper sentence would be "who is going to come to your birthday party?"/ "who is going to attend your birthday party?" using the going to future tense or "who will be at your birthday party?" using conditional present
No, the correct sentence is: "Neither he nor you is going to the party." In this case, "is" should be used because neither "he" nor "you" is singular.
No, the sentence should be "Neither Bert nor Holly is going to the party" to show correct subject-verb agreement. "Is" should be used instead of "are" because "neither" is a singular subject, so the verb should also be singular.
Franci? Lol. BTW, capatialize the I. Re: the suggested answer: The word is "capitalize" from "capital" (not, as the answer says, "capatialize"... from capacious?)
They are going is correct.
The correct verb tense for "isn't" is present tense (or simple present). It is a contraction of "is not." For example, "He isn't going to the party."
That is the correct spelling of the term "cocktail party."
Yes, "You can't make it to the party" is correct.
It is grammatically correct but not idiomatically correct - unless you refer to the creation of a political party. Speaking of a social event we say "have a party," "put on a party", "put together a party" or even "hold a party" so the correct idiom would be one of those.
No, is should be "are" instead of "is" as the subject is plural
We are going to the Jones is the correct one.
'Enrollment now going on' is correct.