Results and discussion sections are crucial in research papers as they present the findings of the study and provide an interpretation of those results. The results section informs readers about the outcomes of the research, while the discussion section allows authors to explain the significance of those results in the context of the study's objectives and existing knowledge in the field. Together, these sections help to communicate the study's contribution to the scientific community.
Investigation of what?
The 5 elements of a research problem are the abstract, methods, results, discussion, and references. The abstract is a summary of the research. Methods and results are calculated. A discussion of the methods used and the results of each take place. References are checked and double-checked.
The discussion compares the government's current-year results with the previous year and may include charts, graphs, or tables to illustrate the discussion
WikiAnswers is an answer site. We will not complete your discussion paper for you. They are, after all, your discussion papers. You discuss them.
Yes, in the sense of having only academic importance. Used dismissively, as in "This entire discussion is moot."
If you are speaking as a person whose first language is English, the answer is communication. If you are another 'normal' person the importance needs discussion.
A motion for an "Urgent Question" can be used to raise a discussion in the house on a matter of urgent public importance. This motion allows members to seek an immediate response from a government minister on the pressing issue at hand.
The correct sequencing of the sections of the main body of a journal article typically follows this order: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. The Introduction outlines the research question and context, the Methods detail the approach taken to conduct the study, the Results present the findings, and the Discussion interprets the results and their implications. Some articles may also include a Literature Review section before the Methods or combine Results and Discussion into one section.
Experimenting with basic microscopy techniques involves learning how to prepare slides, adjust lighting and focus, and identify structures in samples. This discussion would cover the importance of proper sample preparation, how to use different types of microscopes effectively, and interpreting results accurately. It would also touch on the significance of controls, calibration, and troubleshooting common issues.
An Experiment has no use without its documentation. Regarding this: The Lab Book; it contains - Protocol; Equipment; chemicals this and procedures that, compression of the results occurs in the Conclusion, while The Discussion is the Section of the Report that follows the Conclusion. {An experiment has no use without its documentation. Re: the Lab Book : Protocol; Equipment; chemicals this and procedures that, discussion of the results occurs in the Conclusion}.
The order is aim, hypothesis, materials, method, results, discussion and then conclusion.
W. W. Eure has written: 'Results of the experimental discussion project for rural young adults' -- subject(s): Forums (Discussion and debate)