Results and discussion sections are crucial in research papers as they present the findings of the study and provide an interpretation of those results. The results section informs readers about the outcomes of the research, while the discussion section allows authors to explain the significance of those results in the context of the study's objectives and existing knowledge in the field. Together, these sections help to communicate the study's contribution to the scientific community.
Investigation of what?
The 5 elements of a research problem are the abstract, methods, results, discussion, and references. The abstract is a summary of the research. Methods and results are calculated. A discussion of the methods used and the results of each take place. References are checked and double-checked.
The discussion compares the government's current-year results with the previous year and may include charts, graphs, or tables to illustrate the discussion
WikiAnswers is an answer site. We will not complete your discussion paper for you. They are, after all, your discussion papers. You discuss them.
The results section of a lab report presents the findings of the experiment, including data, statistics, and relevant observations, often in the form of tables or figures, without interpretation. In contrast, the discussion section analyzes and interprets these results, explaining their significance, how they relate to the hypothesis, and how they fit into the broader context of existing research. Essentially, the results present what was found, while the discussion addresses what those findings mean.
Yes, in the sense of having only academic importance. Used dismissively, as in "This entire discussion is moot."
If you are speaking as a person whose first language is English, the answer is communication. If you are another 'normal' person the importance needs discussion.
The correct sequencing of the sections of the main body of a journal article typically follows this order: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. The Introduction outlines the research question and context, the Methods detail the approach taken to conduct the study, the Results present the findings, and the Discussion interprets the results and their implications. Some articles may also include a Literature Review section before the Methods or combine Results and Discussion into one section.
A motion for an "Urgent Question" can be used to raise a discussion in the house on a matter of urgent public importance. This motion allows members to seek an immediate response from a government minister on the pressing issue at hand.
An Experiment has no use without its documentation. Regarding this: The Lab Book; it contains - Protocol; Equipment; chemicals this and procedures that, compression of the results occurs in the Conclusion, while The Discussion is the Section of the Report that follows the Conclusion. {An experiment has no use without its documentation. Re: the Lab Book : Protocol; Equipment; chemicals this and procedures that, discussion of the results occurs in the Conclusion}.
Experimenting with basic microscopy techniques involves learning how to prepare slides, adjust lighting and focus, and identify structures in samples. This discussion would cover the importance of proper sample preparation, how to use different types of microscopes effectively, and interpreting results accurately. It would also touch on the significance of controls, calibration, and troubleshooting common issues.
The discussion of this practical typically involves analyzing the results obtained during the experiment, comparing them to theoretical expectations, and addressing any discrepancies. It may also cover the implications of the findings, potential sources of error, and suggestions for future research or improvements to the methodology. Additionally, the discussion often highlights the significance of the results in the broader context of the subject area.