Um, they were both contributions. I think the question might be misworded.
Industrialization created a high demand for labor to support the growth of industries. This demand led to the expansion of slavery as a way to meet the workforce needs of industries such as cotton farming and manufacturing. The efficiency and productivity of slave labor made it an attractive option for many industries during the industrialization period.
Without slavery, the South would have developed a more diversified economy, potentially fostering industries beyond agriculture, such as manufacturing and commerce. The social structure would likely be more equitable, reducing the stark class divisions that characterized the antebellum period. Additionally, the region might have experienced a more gradual and stable integration of African Americans into society, leading to different cultural and social dynamics. Overall, the absence of slavery would have significantly altered the South's historical trajectory and its relationship with the rest of the United States.
Slavery provided labor for the developing textile industries in the southern colonies.
No, only in the south colonies. The north colonies were against slavery. There were few in the north colonies.
Slavery and i do not know
The sugar industry and the cotton industry.
Because the North was into manufacturing instead of agriculture as the south was.
mostly textile industries like mirror factory
it effected it by getting what they wanted. slavery to end.
The union of slavery and cotton were able to impede the South's development into two important areas, the industries and railroad. The union slavery and cotton were also central to the South's prosperity.
Doesn't exist in America anymore.
Yes, but far fewer than in the 18th century on onwards. Slavery began to boom around 1660 during the transition from the tobacco to sugar industries.