All filtered cigarettes, regardless of "strength", pose the same health risks; non-filter cigarettes, however, increase a user's risk of lung cancer more than filtered varieties. There is some speculation that menthol cigarettes are more harmful than non-mentholated varieties, as users of menthol cigarettes tend to take deeper and longer inhalations due to menthol's perceived "cooling" effects on the throat and chest. With that said, Marlboro Reds are probably less harmful than Marlboro Smooths, albeit the difference is negligible.
Is Newport more likely to give you cancer then Marlboro.
It's not that menthol cigarettes are more dangerous, it's just that for some reason they appear to be harder to give up than regular cigarettes. because of the "cool" that comes from smoking menthols, menthol smokers may inhale deeper, thus increasing negative side affects more quickly and rapidly than non-mentholated cigarettes.
Nope
Smoking is bad regardless of when you start smoking. And the longer you smoke the worse it is for you health.
yes
They could get lung cancer by second hand smoke or even worse die.They could get lung cancer by second hand smoke or even worse die.
Smoke. Booze is a close second.
Emphysema is a disease which does tend to get worse once it appears. However, it will get worse faster if a person continues to smoke.
Wood smoke is much worse than tobacco second hand smoke. Wood smoke contains more than twelve times as many carcinogenic compounds, and is chemically active up to forty times longer in the lungs than tobacco.
Women that smoke are more likely to get cramps so I'm pretty sure that if you smoke during your cramping it can make it worse well at least it does for me
Smoke because it will get it worse.
no, inhaling smoke, especially cigarette smoke will only make it worse.