Yes, deserts can support limited agriculture if water for irrigation is available.
The main land use in Australia is agriculture. 62% of Australia is used as agricultural land and for livestock grazing. This is because the deserts are not all sandy deserts and dunes, but semi-arid plains, which support scrubby vegetation.
The UK doesn't have any deserts. It's a rainy place. You don't get deserts in rainy places.
Deserts have limited water and rainfall. They are unable to support dense animal and plant populations.
Syrians struggle with agriculture because they live in deserts and it is very hard to plant plants in a desert.
Deserts generally do not have enough water to support a forest so your question is an oxymoron. Deserts and forests are separate biomes.
No, it was Jefferson.
Deserts generally have less water to support large populations.
Antarctica, Europe, and Antarctica do not have hot deserts. Europe has a more temperate climate, and Antarctica is too cold to support a hot desert environment.
Agriculture is essential for providing food, fiber, and other resources that support human life.
Deserts generally do not have sufficient water to support many trees.
Canals in deserts are useful for irrigation, allowing the diversion of water from rivers or reservoirs to arid regions, which supports agriculture and helps sustain local communities. They can also facilitate transportation and trade by providing navigable routes through otherwise inaccessible areas. Additionally, canals can help manage water resources, mitigate flooding, and support biodiversity by creating habitats in otherwise barren landscapes.
Generally, it is because the agriculture is better in the central areas, unlike the deserts of the north.