Due to the destruction of the rainforests, there is less oxygen for humans to breathe.
Consumer consumption leades to this. The less we consume the less will be harmed Consumer consumption leades to this. The less we consume the less will be harmed
Human beings - if they survived - would be in a less advanced state than many other animals.
No, the loss of human beings would have significant ecological, social, and cultural consequences. Human activities have impacted ecosystems and biodiversity in unique ways, and our extinction could still have lasting effects on the planet's overall stability and balance. Additionally, the preservation of human life is inherently valued by society.
Less than one.
b cos it is already acidic
Because the people who enslaved them had no respect for them or their culture. To them, the slaves were less than human beings. They were harshly mistreated because they were simply "different."
With respect. They are not anything less, or more, then you are. They are Human beings with feelings, thoughts, desires, hopes, love, and needs. Treat them as you would like to be treated.
less pollution and less of rainforests being cut.us
A possible response would be that priests are human, and like all human beings, none are perfect, and some are less perfect than others.
Agriculture is highly dependent on plant pollination in order to produce the food we eat. Without adequate pollination less food (if any) will be produced, which means less food to feed more hungry mouths.
taking away jobs for us humans A. If it make a mistake it will never compensate or learn that he has made a mistake
The speaker imagines the woman to be singing about an old sad ballad about battles, or a less noble song about the sorrows human beings feel.