Castles in the times of William the Conqueror, had weak edges, the enemy could attack and bash through, so
they built round towers to cover up the edge's.
A castles weakness is the bridge, flags, and other things unknown.
ramsbottom hahah bottom hallarious
Castles changed because people kept on finding stronger materials and better structure. To keep castles going now they would of had to find a material that couldn't be effected by gunpowder, which is nearly impossible! Also they were some disadvantages about some castles such as the Motte and Bailey castle it had a weakness and the weakness was that it was made out of wood and could burn.So they changed it to a stone keep and this just carries on changing and changing getting better and better. Hope that helps.
Rounded Arch
Type your answer here... They were constructed of wood and susceptible to fire if attacked by enemies.
Stone castles were built because they could not burn down as ealsily as wood castles can.
Commerce problems could be solved with trade
There were various castle weaknesses. It depends what castle type you are talking about. Wooden castles were used, but had the obvious downfall of no fire resistance, so stone was used instead. Then, because the corners of their square castles were the weakest parts, the builders made circular castles. v3n0m531
The types were mott and bailey. Stone keep castles, Military castles, castles for royalty, rich, lords, and nyone who could afford a castle
The could be but they could also be made of stone.
Could the colonies labor problem have been solved without slavery?
Artillery (Cannons) could collapse them.