because more people can afford things like oak furniture and this leads to more wood being needed
aka major deforistation
We are destroying rain forests NOT helping them.
Because homes of the tribes living in the rainforests are getting flooded
Find an economically sound reason to keep rainforests or to not destroy rainforests, and people will either try to keep the rainforests or at least stop destroying them. Also, use of force, probably through government, can stop many attempts to destroy rainforests.
we can do all staff to get money and help tropical rainforest
yes because co co beans grow there
Companies use the rainforests for the timber and wood, which we use lots. Roads are built for easy access. Cattle ranchers need the open land for their cattle and clear forest. People such as miners are digging oil rigs. Medicine purposes - The rosy perriwinkle especially Tourism Coffee and fruit production
Sort of, You could plant (lets say 100 trees) and cut down 100 trees or cut them down then plant them again
Answer: Many species would be wiped off the face of the planet; carbon dioxide would be released from dead trees, which hold it while they are alive; much of the Earth's oxygen would be gone; and the life and culture of the native peoples of the rain forests would be gone.
Australia has more than two types of rainforest. Australia has tropical rainforests, sub-tropical rainforests, warm temperate rainforests and cool temperate rainforests.
there are no rainforests in Slovakia
There are no rainforests in Canada.
Logging and slash-and-burn clearing for agriculture first, but the big problem is the erosion that follows after that kind of clearing. Erosion caused by unsustainable agriculture and logging prohibits the forest from growing back.