britsh missions were on the south and the spanish were on the west
britsh missions were on the south and the spanish were on the west
britsh missions were on the south and the spanish were on the west
french missions were put on the east coast and spanish on the west
French were from France, and Spanish were from Spain.
The biggest differences is in how the three treated the Native Americans. The French treated Native Americans with more respect and many French lived with the natives. They traded with them and had good relationships. The British thought of the Native Americans as a problem from the start and felt that they should leave the land to the British. They did their best to kill them or drive them out of their native areas. The Spanish were even worse. They enslaved the Native Americans that they encountered. The missions they set up still have the mass graves of the Natives that worked on the missions grounds.
they didnt french British dutch and the spanish all had there own
No it was never a British colony, it was French, Spanish and then purchased by the United States. No it was never a British colony, it was French, Spanish and then purchased by the United States.
Never. Only British and French.
Beginning with Christopher Columbus, these patterns were referred to by the Spanish as Las Conquistas. The explorers who carried out these missions to colonize the New World were known as Conquistadors.
They were basically unsuccessful and the Spanish responded with building more missions.
Mainly the British, Spanish and French
French, English, and Spanish are the main languages in the Caribbean due to the historical legacy of colonization by European powers. Different islands were colonized by different countries, leading to the establishment of these languages as dominant. Each language reflects the colonial history of the respective island, such as French in former French colonies, English in former British colonies, and Spanish in former Spanish colonies.