actually if animals are born in captivity they should not be released because they do not have the parents or instincts to help them learn to find food and survive. Think of it this way, if a tiger was born in a zoo and you released it it would die because it didn't have it's parents in the wild to teach it how to hunt and do other things to stay alive, so animals born in captivity must stay in captivity.
they should be kept free because they can have space to move and communicate with relatives and plus if they were in zoos they would communicate through glass which they are suppose to comunicate together.. hope this workss
no they should be free
That is a matter of opinion.
No, animals kept in zoos are there for breeding purposes, or for the public to enjoy.
because animals wont grow in there natural habitats
No animals should be kept in zoos, they should be free or be release back into their native habitat after rehabilitation.
Animals that are in zoos don't belong cooped up like they are in zoos. The wildlife preserves are more natural and they are easier for the animals.
in paddocks
these are some: that toys are a waste of money kids should vote for prime ministers animals should be kept in zoos, or the opposite animals should be not kept in zoos schools should be banned we should have more bike roads then cars
Animals should be kept in zoos, because they provide educational help for kids to learn about animals, without the risk of injury to themselves or the animals. Also some animals are endangered and are better off kept in zoos with a safe, protected environment with out being hurt by their predators.
I believe some animal should. Endangered animals should be bred in safety to increase the population.
no it shouldn't because they need too be free
Some people think animals should be kept in the wild.