j
m. . . .
Historians can learn about past societies' daily life, cultural practices, and technological advancements from archaeological evidence. By studying artifacts, structures, and landscapes, historians can gain insights into ancient economies, social structures, and religious beliefs. Additionally, archaeological evidence can provide information about trade networks, migration patterns, and interactions between different societies.
Archaeological evidence can include artifacts (objects made by humans), ecofacts (natural materials used or modified by humans), features (non-portable structures or remains), and sites (locations where evidence of past human activity is found). These different types of evidence help archaeologists piece together information about past cultures and societies.
Most likely they were myth based on real societies in which women were held in higher esteem than in most societies in the Greek world (ie, the Peloponnese, Ionia, Italy), probably to the north. There is little archaeological evidence for a society of Amazons, but there is evidence for societies in which women may have spent much of their lives on horseback and died in battle.
No, the two societies never went to war with each other. However there is archaeological evidence that the Romans used ancient Norwegians and Danes in their army.
There is an archaeological dig in our own town.This site is of archaeological importance.Archaeological evidence suggests that the Celts never knew what a banana is.
Most of what we know about preliterate societies is based on archaeological evidence, such as artifacts, cave paintings, and burial sites. Studying the material culture left behind by these societies helps us gain insight into their way of life, social structure, and beliefs. Ethnographic studies of contemporary hunter-gatherer societies also provide valuable information on preliterate societies.
Archaeological evidence is limited by what has survived over time, which may not accurately represent the full diversity of practices within a culture. Additionally, biases in the preservation of certain materials can skew the archaeological record. Interpretations of evidence can also be influenced by the biases and perspectives of the archaeologists themselves.
History is the study of past events and human societies based on written records. Archaeology, on the other hand, is the study of past human societies through material culture remains. These two fields work together by combining historical records with archaeological evidence to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the past. Archaeology can provide physical evidence to support historical accounts, while history can provide context for interpreting archaeological findings.
Archaeological
Archaeological
Archaeological sources are physical objects or remains (such as artifacts, structures, and ancient tools) that provide evidence of past human societies, while literary sources are written texts that offer insights into historical events, beliefs, and traditions. Archaeological sources are tangible, while literary sources are more interpretive and can provide details on culture and societal norms not typically found in artifacts.