The analogy "GROVE : TREE" suggests a relationship where a grove is a collection or grouping of trees. Therefore, the answer to this analogy could be "FOREST : TREES," as a forest is a larger grouping or collection of trees, similar to how a grove is a smaller grouping.
Oh, dude, it's like person is to crowd as tree is to... a forest! Because, you know, a person is part of a crowd, and a tree is part of a forest. It's all about fitting in and being surrounded by your peeps... or leaves, in the case of a tree.
Fruit trees bear fruit while forest trees can or cant they just have to be in a forest. So fruit trees is a much narrower thing then forest trees.
a group of trees is called a forest of trees
oak trees , red wood trees , and forest wood trees
a forest is a compact of many trees where in different animals live. The forest need trees so the animals can live there. The forest needs that many trees.
Yes, the noun forest is a collective noun; a forest of trees. Other collective nouns for trees are a stand of trees, a copse of trees, or a grove of trees.
Tree is to forest as sheep is to flock.
An example of an analogy in Fahrenheit 451 is when the burning books are compared to burning trees in a forest fire. This comparison highlights the destructive nature of burning books and the impact it has on society's knowledge and wisdom.
You can't see the trees for the forest!
fruit trees grow fruit and forest trees don't grow anything.
Forest trees are taller because there is more space for them to grow. Forest trees are taller because there is more space for them to grow.