What are the similarities and differences between motte and Bailey castles and stone castles?

Answer 1

Oh, dude, motte and Bailey castles are like the fast food of castles - quick to build, but not super sturdy. Stone castles, on the other hand, are like the five-star hotels of castles - fancy, durable, and built to last. The main similarity is they're both castles, but one's like a cardboard box and the other's like a fortress.

Answer 2

Tactically, a motte and bailey left much to be desired as it was a relatively cheap and easy castle to build, and it may have been all that was needed to control an area. In many places, a better castle would have been expensive overkill.

wood would burn down and bailey would as well

Answer 3

AMotte and Bailey castle is made out of wood but Stone Keep castles were made out of well...stone. This makes them very different to each other because Stone Keep castles are stronger than Motte and Bailey castles which means that they are different to each other for these reasons as well: * Stone keep castles don't rot within a few years, but will remain standing for centuries to come * Stone Keep castles don't burn * Stone Keep castles have high up towers, enabling the defenders to fire arrows down at the attackers but not allowing the attackers to fire up at them

Answer 4

motte castles were made of wood and they could be burnt easily and the stone castles were solid and couldn't burn easily

Answer 5

Try guessing