Get an attorney.
first off its not stealing til you leave the shop with it and depending on what age the minor was,he would NT be convicted but if its coal minors them boys would steal anything
Obviously, you should report anyone who is stealing from a store.
Yes, you may have grounds to sue a clothing store for defamation if they falsely accused you of stealing and it damaged your reputation or caused you harm. You would need to prove that their accusation was false, that they communicated this accusation to others, and that it resulted in quantifiable damages. It is advisable to consult with a lawyer to discuss the specifics of your case and determine the best course of action.
no
If caught stealing, you could face consequences such as legal action, fines, community service, or even jail time depending on the value of the stolen items and the laws in that particular jurisdiction. Additionally, you may be issued a civil demand letter requiring you to pay a fine to the store owner. It's important to remember that stealing is a crime and can have serious long-term consequences.
I can give you several sentences.Thievery is a crime.His habit of thievery got him into trouble again and again.She was accused of thievery by the store owner.
The man was a malefactor because of his constant stealing of others belonging from their bags.
Sure is. Below are the legal arguments which prove that Lindsay Lohan is being falsely accused of stealing a necklace: The Associated Press reported "Sofia Kaman said she waited a day to report the necklace stolen because Lohan had told her she would return the next day to purchase a ring. The actress never returned. The first time Kaman saw Lohan since the Jan. 22 store visit was Friday. Kaman says she did not have any agreement with Lohan allowing her to leave the store with the necklace." According to Sofia Kaman's testimony, she never suspected that Lohan stole the necklace at all on the day Lohan is alleged to have taken it or she should not have allowed Lohan to leave the store with the necklace on or should have reported to the police right after Lohan left the store. It was TACIT AGREEMENT on Kaman's part that Lohan could leave the store with the unpaid necklace since Kaman testified that she did not report to the police right away because Lohan told her she would return the next day to purchase a ring. It is totally inappropriate for Kaman to falsely accuse Lohan of stealing the necklace when she had tacitly allowed her to leave the store with it based on the promise that she would return to the store to buy a ring. It is wrong that the store management would falsely accuse her of stealing the necklace she was tacitly allowed to leave the store with based on her promise of returning to buy a ring.
Hart's lured customers to the store for a bargain that was out of stock.
John was banned from the store for shoplifting because he was caught stealing items without paying for them.
They definitely would get fired and might be told they can never work at any store for the company- but they also would possibly be prosecuted as eating unpaid merchandise technically is stealing.