If a desert located near a city is not protected, it may face significant environmental degradation due to urban expansion, pollution, and resource extraction. This could lead to habitat loss for native flora and fauna, as well as increased vulnerability to invasive species. Additionally, the desert's unique ecosystems could be disrupted, impacting local climate patterns and water resources. Ultimately, the loss of biodiversity and natural beauty could diminish the area's ecological health and recreational value.
If the desert is located along a coastline it might be subject to a tsunami.
What would happen to the animal is that it might die because throughout its whole life it lived in the rainforest. Also because it doesn't know how to live in a desert and it doesn't have the adaptions for the desert.
no its located in Southern Africa The Kalahari Desert is not located in Northern Africa. Its mostly in Botswana & South Africa. This might be referred to as south central Africa. The Tropic of Capricorn runs through this desert.
If anything, the plant or animal might live a bit better off as a grassland receives more rainfall than a desert. There are a number of plants and animals that already live in both the desert and the grasslands.
Most probably the receptacles downstream from the GFCI would not be protected by the GFCI receptacle.
It will be more fair to people and it will be easier for people to get there. --------------- It is better protected from attack by invaders.
Carnivores, herbivores and omnivores might share a desert habitat.
If a desert suddenly experiences a big rainfall, flash flooding can occur.
you might find them i desert
No, but you might sell coffee to a person in the desert.
Antarctica is a cold desert....
Yes because then the species might die if they arent protected