The two primary groups that had land claims on the Mississippi River were the French and the Spanish. The French initially claimed large territories along the river, establishing New Orleans and other settlements. Following the French and Indian War, Spain gained control of the region, retaining its influence until the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, when the United States acquired the land.
The Choctaw and Ojibwe were two of thr tribes that had claims on it that weren't honored by European immigrants.
hi saneka here the spanish and the french
The Spanish and the French were negotiating the ownership of the Louisiana territory.
Two reasons were new taxes and banning of settlement/land claims in the Ohio River Valley territory.
Small plots of land in the Gold Country were called mining claims. These claims were typically 20 acres in size and granted to individuals or groups for the purpose of searching for gold.
The state of Tasmania in Australia has no active Aboriginal land claims, primarily due to its complex history of colonization and land dispossession. While there have been land rights movements and some recognition of Aboriginal heritage, formal land claims under the Native Title Act have not been successful in Tasmania. Other states, like New South Wales and Queensland, have recognized land claims and granted native title to Aboriginal groups.
i know one of them is Treaty of Paris.
Ceded its western claim that extended Mississippi River to the Federal Government.
Well the french had a lot of land west of the Mississippi river. However when they lost the war, all the land they ruled went under British control. That's it.
The effect was the Choctaw new lands west of Mississippi River exchange for their Land
My thoughts are: Land is to River as Body is to Artery or veins~ perhaps?
when a person claims land: title the land