If there were no national parks, many natural ecosystems would likely face degradation due to unchecked development, pollution, and resource extraction. Biodiversity would suffer as species lose their habitats, leading to potential extinctions. Additionally, the absence of national parks would diminish opportunities for public recreation, education, and connection to nature, ultimately affecting human well-being and cultural heritage. Conservation efforts would also be significantly weakened without designated protected areas.
National parks are established by the governing bodies of whatever country they happen to be in. In the U.S. that would be the U.S. Congress.
National parks are protected. Nobody can cut down trees in a national park. This would stop deforestation.
The number of state parks and national parks that can fit into Wyoming would depend on which state and national parks you choose and their sizes.Wyoming has:12 State Parks2 National Parks5 National Forests1 National Historic Landmark1 National Historic Site4 National Wildlife Refuges2 National Recreation Areas
Without animals in our National Parks it would be quite quiet and uninteresting. If all animals were out of the National Parks things may never be the same. It would be harder to bring them all back in if they had been killed or driven out. If the animals had to be replaced back into the National it would be a job.
what woud happen if van mahotsav programes are not started by government and nationa parks and wild ife sanuries are not se up in India?
Kenyans are not allowed to farm in national parks is because farming would endanger African wildlife.
Trailer parks would last longer
Yes, some national parks and monuments are within urban areas.
The Montane Cordillera ecozone, with 7 national parks, has the most national parks.
Dep. of the Interior
national parks are awesome.
There are 130 National parks in Sydney