Zoos are the antithesis of animal liberation! Animals in captivity on display for human entertainment violates the philosophy of the ALM.
If your asking do people, such as a animal keeper's at the zoo, have the right to keep animals in an environment with caves. Then, yes I agree, they have the right and duty to maintane a habitat as close to the animal's natural habitat as possible.
some hindus are disagree but many are not disagree
At some Zoos they do.
yes because in zoos they protect animals
no
We disagree with the idea of closing all zoos for fear of imperilling the animals.
Zoos play a vital role in animal conservation. Zoos are not only a place to educate people about animals and what they needs, zoos also typically have breeding programs. They do their best to breed new generations of rare and endangered animals.
so the animal doesn't harm anyone
Free the Jews
8000
Some would disagree with this statement and others believe that all animals should be free. Yet with the extinction rate of endangered and threatened animals zoos are a safe heaven for the survival of certain and many species. Some dislike the idea of a captive animal but many captive animals born in captivity at zoos knows nothing else and their survival in the wild could be it's disadvantage. Before one puts down zoos, they should take in to account that many animals at zoos are rescue animals from humans who wanted a dangerous animal but could not properly contain them. In my opinion zoos is not degrading, educational is a better choice of words. Unless you enjoy looking at a stuffed DEAD animals, that is what will happen without any zoos. It's a sad truthful concept.
Zoos have warning signs posted to protect both the visitor and the animal. Teasing the animals can stress them out and cause the animal to try to attack the visitors or zookeepers.