Because over the years the Timber rotted away and left only the Mound
In 1264, Warwick Castle was a predominantly wooden structure, with a motte-and-bailey design featuring a wooden palisade and tower. It did not have the stone fortifications that it has today. The castle would have been smaller in scale compared to its later expansions and renovations.
it is quicker and easier to build the castle.
each castle looked different , but the first castle was a very important one i'm very sorry but all i know is that it would be made out of stone, have lots of curtains and expensive cloth fro the beds - and very very unhygenic thank you! It's "The Tower of London"
Ir was difficult to tell what elizabeth looked like because they changed her looks to make her look either older or younger.
Hedingham is typical of English castles since it was really two (perhaps three) different castles built on the same site. The original, first castle was a simple motte-and-bailey built by Sir Aubrey de Vere in about 1100. This included no stone in its construction, simply ditches, earth banks and timber palisades and towers. It had two baileys and a large earth mound (the motte). In about 1130 the central donjon or tower was rebuilt in stone and a stone gatehouse, hall and towers were added (only the central tower survives today). The link below shows a modern reconstruction of how the second castle looked in about 1130 - 1140. Notice that anyone approaching the gatehouse had to pass within bowshot of the walls of the inner bailey.
Metal wasn't used in building castles. They were wooden Mott and bailey with wooden walls on high hills or outcrops. When gunpowder was invented the castle put stone facade in front of the wooden walls. The would fill the gap between the wood and stone with the leftover stones and the stone facade looked solid and protective.
no i don't think it has i looked it up and there's only the book
it has ruins which show/give an idea to people of how the castles actually would've looked like.
A castle was a fort, and a manor house was the home of the lord of an estate. They were not the same thing; though a manor house could be fortified, and if it were looked very like a castle; and a castle could be used by the lord of an estate as his home. A castle usually had a curtain wall and a ward or courtyard, and a fortified manor usually did not, and that might distinguish a castle used as a home from a fortified manor house. Oh heck, the difference depended on what the lord called it.
I looked this up to be sure of my answer. Historians believe he spoke Latin and Greek. __ The word used for the language was "Hunnish" which is thought to have been a Turkic or Ural-Altaic language but so few words are recorded, it's difficult to say what the language really was. A number of languages came under the Hunnish umbrella.
It most likely looked clumpy and was probably difficult to apply.
Yes a castle was a community, with many staff: the constable or castellan looked after the buildings and defences; the marshal was in charge of the horses, garrison and outside servants; the chamberlain oversaw food and drink; and the steward ran the estates and finances! Hope this helps!!:)