There are many reasons, it is a very realistic strategy game for a start. There are also many facets to te hobby, such as painting, modeling and converting which encourages a lot more ownership in the hobby.
It can however be expensive, but the hobby is very rewarding.
Both are equelly good but warhammer beats wow by 5%. It is a matter of opinion, I prefer warhammer as it is more active, fun and you interact with people literally.
Axis and Allies.
No...it is however awsome fun. Some people consider it to be nerdy but if you like it, play it
God yes, but once you get past the basics it's easy to remember and fun.
CALL OF DUTY! Warhammer is for loners and noobs, COD can be quite boring at times but is more interesting, social, fun and definetly not Geeky like Warhammer!
BF: Bad Company or Halo 3 or Warhammer Online black ops and mw3
AnswerNo, Warhammer is quite expensive
There are a few such as FANTASY: Blood Bowl 1995 Warhammer: Mark of Chaos 2006 Warhammer: Battle March2008 Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning 2008 Blood Bowl 2009 WARHAMMER 40000 Space Crusade 1992 Space Hulk 1993 Space Hulk: Vengeance of the Blood Angels 1995 Final Liberation 1997 Warhammer 40,000: Chaos Gate1998 Warhammer 40,000: Rites of War 1999 Warhammer 40,000: Fire Warrior 2003 Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War2004 Warhammer 40,000: Glory in Death 2006 Warhammer 40,000: Squad Command 2007 Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War II 2009 Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine Unknown Warhammer 40,000 Online 2012
Rick priestley is credited to be the driving force and idea machine behind warhammer and warhammer 40k
AnswerWarhammer 40k started in 1987.
If you mean Warhammer 40,000 and Warhammer Fantasy Battle witch Warhammer online is based there was in earlier versions of the games, But much of i has been changed in the current incarnation.
NO, the games are too different.