Most of them are one syllable verbs:
hit, beat, quit, set, spread, cast, etc.
let cut cost let put set split shut
Yes, for regular verbs the past tense and past participle are the same. Both are formed by adding "-ed" to the base form of the verb. For example, "talk" becomes "talked" in both the past tense and past participle.
Past tense of lead; ie, led. Past tense of feed; ie, fed. Past tense of cry; ie, cried. Past tense of fry; ie fried. There are many past tense verbs which end in -ed while at the same time not all past tense verbs necessarily do end in -ed.
Set and bet are also the same in past tense.
beatbetbesetbroadcastburstcastcostcutfithithurtknitletputquitridshedshutslitspreadthrusttelecastburst
agree in tense. This means that all the verbs in the sentence are in the same form, either present, past, or future tense.
To change a verb to past tense, you typically add '-ed' to regular verbs (e.g. walk - walked) but irregular verbs have unique past tense forms (e.g. go - went). Regular verbs follow the same pattern, while irregular verbs must be memorized.
Because they are regular verbs. The past tense and past participle are always the same and always end in -ed. Irregular verbs, however, don't follow this pattern and are all different. You must learn their forms.
Examples of irregular verbs that have the same present and past tense forms are "hit," "cut," and "wet."
No, "read" is the correct spelling for the past tense of read.
The word distraught is an adjective and so doesn't have a past tense. It is only verbs that have tenses.
A regular verb forms its past tense by adding -d or -ed. The past participle of a regular verb is the same as the past tense. eg listen / listened hate / hated wrap / wrapped An irregular verb forms its past tense by - changing its spelling or sometimes the same word or sometimes a completely new word. eg run / ran, write / wrote, feel / felt, cut / cut The past participle is different from the past tense.