no
A voice recording of someone's conversation is not admissible in family court in the state of Colorado. This type of recording can be presented to a police officer who can write a report to submit to the court. However, if you are not disclosing to another party that their conversation is being recorded you may face criminal charges.
AA meetings can be admissible in court. If they are court ordered or relevant to an issue or evidence, then it usually is admissible.
Your mode of dress is not admissible in court. The evidence cries to be admissible, your honor!
No
It depends on how the recorder and the tapes, came to be used and entered into evidence. If it was from a court authorizerd/court ordered wiretap, yes, it can be. Sound recordings from other sources are generally not admissible due to the conflict with the "hearsay" rule, not to mention several other conflicts in law.
Hearsay
The evidence was not admissible in court due to it having no relevance to the proceedings.
Yes, faxes can be used in court. Emails, post-its, and other types of documents are admissible as well.
Yes, text messages are generally admissible as evidence in court, as long as they meet the requirements for authenticity and relevance.
In a court of law the only evidence that can be admissible must be gotten legally.
Yes, a recorded phone call can be admissible in court as evidence, but it must meet certain legal requirements to be considered admissible, such as being relevant to the case and obtained legally.
Confessions made to a priest are generally considered confidential and protected by the priest-penitent privilege, which means they are not admissible in court as evidence.